I have seen the "Arial Unicode" font. I think its kana are ugly. I believe
the person responsible for the kana probably was unfamiliar with kana.
Is there a "Fraktur Unicode" font in the works? Fraktur Hangul should be
amusing, to say the least. The only words I can read in hangul are "Ramyon"
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Jungshik Shin wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Doug Ewell wrote:
> > Maggie Yeung wrote:
> > > Can someone think of any other issues related to using Unicode font.
> >
> > I find it mildly annoying that Outlook Express picks a font on the
> > basis of the encoding chosen for a
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Doug Ewell wrote:
> Maggie Yeung wrote:
>
> > Can someone think of any other issues related to using Unicode font.
>
> I find it mildly annoying that Outlook Express picks a font on the
> basis of the encoding chosen for a given message. On this list and
> the IDN list, a
At 22:27 3/30/2002, Maggie Yeung wrote:
>We have developed a Windows software product and it will be
>localized into 10 different languages, including several Asian
>languages. What's the pro and cons of :
>
>1. Use Unicode font for all languages
>2. Use Roman font for Latin1 languages and Unico
Maggie
Yeung wrote:
> Can someone think of any other issues related to using Unicode
font.
I find it mildly annoying that Outlook Express picks a font on the basis of
the encoding chosen for a given message. On this list and the IDN list, a
message encoded as JIS or EUC-KR or BIG5 will
/
- Original Message -
From: "Maggie Yeung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 10:27 PM
Subject: Unicode Font Pros and Cons
We have developed a Windows software product and it will be
localized into 10 different languages, i
We have developed a Windows software product and it
will belocalized into 10 different languages, including several
Asianlanguages. What's the pro and cons of :
1. Use Unicode font for all languages2. Use
Roman font for Latin1 languages and Unicode font for Asian
languages.
e.g., The pros
7 matches
Mail list logo