On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:36:44 -0400
John W Kennedy wrote:
> Just a reminder that in Apple’s Swift a “Character” is anything that
> looks like a character, including a letter with any theoretically
> unlimited stack of diacritics, a flag, or a skin-toned emoji, and all
>
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 22:07:57 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> > We are miscommunicating. My point was that programming for MS-Windows
> > needs a good understanding of what the UTF-16 surrogates are, and in
> > what MS-Windows APIs/library functions
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 21:20:45 +0300
Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 18:52:03 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> We are miscommunicating. My point was that programming for MS-Windows
> needs a good understanding
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 18:52:03 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> > > It shouldn't. UTF-16 works just like UTF-8, except that the code
> > > units are bigger.
>
> > Not really, since UTF-8 doesn't have surrogates.
>
> It has 115 surrogates, thoroughly
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 18:55:25 +0300
Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> > It shouldn't. UTF-16 works just like UTF-8, except that the code
> > units are bigger.
> Not
> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 16:09:33 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> > > Just steer them away from UTF-16!
> >
> > Which will leave them entirely unprepared for the MS-Windows Unicode
> > programming, something they of course will never need in their
> >
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:36:00 +0300
Eli Zaretskii via Unicode wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:23:40 +0100
> > From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:10 +
> > Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:57:37 +0100 (BST)
William_J_G Overington via Unicode wrote:
> UTF-16 is very useful. I use it in my research project.
> If the byte content of a UTF-16 file is displayed in a hexadecimal
> display then for all plane 0 characters the byte content of
4, 2017 5:18 PM
> To: Unicode Mailing List <unicode@unicode.org>
> Subject: Fwd: Unicode education in Schools
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: David Starner <prosfil...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16
: unicode@unicode.org
Subject : Re: Unicode education in Schools
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:10 +
Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP
> characters as well as BMP characters. Then when
Mark
(https://twitter.com/mark_e_davis)
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:01 PM, Asmus Freytag via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
> On 8/24/2017 10:17 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
>
>> Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
>> cannot handle SMP
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:23:40 +0100
> From: Richard Wordingham via Unicode
>
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:10 +
> Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
>
> > So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP
> > characters as well as BMP
Use String.codePointAt() etc.
El ago. 24, 2017 10:42 PM -0700, Shriramana Sharma via Unicode
, escribió:
> IIUC the limitation seems to be only that functions such as "charAt" do not
> recognize that surrogates aren't valid characters:
>
>
IIUC the limitation seems to be only that functions such as "charAt" do not
recognize that surrogates aren't valid characters:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/charAt
via https://stackoverflow.com/a/8716157/1503120.
This is a problem of many
org>
Subject: Fwd: Unicode education in Schools
-- Forwarded message -
From: David Starner <prosfil...@gmail.com<mailto:prosfil...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
To: Richard Wordingham
<richard.wo
e@unicode.org>:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: David Starner <prosfil...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
> To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wording...@ntlworld.com>
>
>
>
>
&
-- Forwarded message -
From: David Starner <prosfil...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Unicode education in Schools
To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wording...@ntlworld.com>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017, 5:26 PM Richard Wordingham via Unico
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:17:10 +
Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
> So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP
> characters as well as BMP characters. Then when they develop software
> they will, at the start, be thinking beyond ASCII and Unicode BMP
>
On 8/24/2017 10:17 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode wrote:
Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
cannot handle SMP characters.
One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have not
yet updated to utf8mb4 (4 byte encoding)
So, I consider
2017-08-24 19:17 GMT+02:00 Andre Schappo via Unicode :
>
> Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
> cannot handle SMP characters.
>
> One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have
> not yet updated to utf8mb4 (4
Because there are many systems that can now handle BMP characters but not
cannot handle SMP characters.
One example being systems that use mysql utf8 (3 byte encoding) and have not
yet updated to utf8mb4 (4 byte encoding)
So, I consider it important to familiarise students with SMP characters
So how do you think it matters if the characters are in the BMP or SMP?
I came across this School Unicode exercise
https://community.computingatschool.org.uk/resources/4546 The exercise concerns
Emoji but to me the important point is that the schoolchildren are having to
think about SMP characters. I do not know if schools gives an explanation of
the BMP and SMP
23 matches
Mail list logo