On 6/3/2014 10:17 AM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
On the practical side, it might be in order to warn against usage that
relies on some particular interpretation like that. What I mean is
that it is OK to use WARNING SIGN as warning about risk of personal
injury, but questionable to expect that
Good Day -
Just wondering if Unicode provides for or anyone know of documentation for
standard usage around the following symbol:
[cid:image001.png@01CF7C48.A6D54D00]
Noticed that is it used in many applications as a general warning or error
symbol, but upon research it is also the symbol for
Michelle,
Unicode normally does not document all known usages of symbols.
Occasionally, if a symbol is used in ways that might be unexpected from
its name, the standard may add an alias or annotation. This is done in
particular, when there is a question of whether a given symbol is the
2014-06-03 19:13, Asmus Freytag wrote:
Unicode normally does not document all known usages of symbols.
Not to mention unknown usages. Characters will be used in different
ways, no matter what the Unicode Standard says, and it would be mostly
pointless to put restrictions on it. In some
4 matches
Mail list logo
