Gupta, Shubhagam wrote:
... I am curious however; would you
consider XML-based format as the preferred format for future
developments, rather than adopting the plain-text "Format A." available
at Unicode website?
Both the UTR #22 XML format and ICU's .ucm format provide syntax for the distinction
On 10/12/2003 15:11:33 unicode-bounce wrote:
>I am curious however; would you
>consider XML-based format as the preferred format for future
>developments, rather than adopting the plain-text "Format A." available
>at Unicode website?
Be aware that there are classes of mappings which cannot be r
Gupta, Shubhagam wrote:
> Thank you for your clarification. It's clear that existing
> applications with mapping files do not require conversion to XML-based
> format, in order to conform to Unicode. I am curious however; would
> you consider XML-based format as the preferred format for future
>
mber 10, 2003 1:04 AM
To: Unicode Mailing List
Cc: Gupta, Shubhagam
Subject: Re: XML based mapping files.
Shubhagam Gupta wrote:
> I am trying to Implement Unicode Technical Report, UTR 22 and I have
> a few questions about this specification. Since this specification is
> normative, X
Is there a tool which could be useful in doing the conversion
> or it can only be done manually? ICU have extensive repository of XML
> based mapping files, but does any other reference source for XML
> formatted mapping files or the alias table exists, apart from ICU. ?
I don't
conversion of existing mapping files to XML
form. Have other application enforced this conversion to their mapping files.
Is there a tool which could be useful in doing the conversion or it can only be
done manually? ICU have extensive repository of XML based mapping files, but
does any other reference
6 matches
Mail list logo
