Re: ZWJ, ZWNJ and Markup languages.

2015-11-29 Thread Plug Gulp
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: > > They are indeed suitable for use with markup languages. They are so suitable > that they are already provided as entities in RFC 2070, which is now > historic, and from there on through HTML 4.0 and onwards. Please see > http://tools.ietf

Re: ZWJ, ZWNJ and Markup languages.

2015-11-27 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 11/27/2015 5:42 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote: On 2015/11/28 04:55, Plug Gulp wrote: The Unicode standard 8.0 states in chapter 23, section titled "Cursive Connection and Ligatures"(printed page #814, PDF page #850)

Re: ZWJ, ZWNJ and Markup languages.

2015-11-27 Thread Asmus Freytag (t)
On 11/27/2015 11:55 AM, Plug Gulp wrote: Hi, The Unicode standard 8.0 states in chapter 23, section titled "Cursive Connection and Ligatures"(printed page #814, PDF page #850) that: "The zero width joiner and non-joiner characters are designed for use in plain tex

Re: ZWJ, ZWNJ and Markup languages.

2015-11-27 Thread Martin J. Dürst
On 2015/11/28 04:55, Plug Gulp wrote: The Unicode standard 8.0 states in chapter 23, section titled "Cursive Connection and Ligatures"(printed page #814, PDF page #850) that: "The zero width joiner and non-joiner characters are designed for use in plain text; they should not be used where highe

ZWJ, ZWNJ and Markup languages.

2015-11-27 Thread Plug Gulp
Hi, The Unicode standard 8.0 states in chapter 23, section titled "Cursive Connection and Ligatures"(printed page #814, PDF page #850) that: "The zero width joiner and non-joiner characters are designed for use in plain text; they should not be used where higher-level ligation and cursive control