Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-21 Thread Michael Everson
On 21 Nov 2011, at 07:23, Julian Bradfield wrote: Marking the (usually automatic) elisions is markup for elementary students. I can't think of any reason why this shouldn't be achievable in plain text. Many encoded characters exist for paedagogical reasons. Michael Everson *

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-21 Thread John H. Jenkins
Michael Everson 於 2011年11月21日 上午3:37 寫道: On 21 Nov 2011, at 07:23, Julian Bradfield wrote: Marking the (usually automatic) elisions is markup for elementary students. I can't think of any reason why this shouldn't be achievable in plain text. Many encoded characters exist for

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Joó Ádám
Leaving aside that CSS is presentation and not content, and is definitely not markup. HTML is a better candidate. Á

RE: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Peter Constable
From: unicode-bou...@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bou...@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Verdy This arc is a true phonetic mark of a contextual elision... Exactly similar to other phonetic symbols like the elision tie There are two kinds of arc shown in the image: - arcs that span a space

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Asmus Freytag
On 11/20/2011 8:00 AM, Joó Ádám wrote: Leaving aside that CSS is presentation and not content, and is definitely not markup. HTML is a better candidate. Á The details of the appearance of the mark would be presentation. The scoping, like for applying every other style feature, would have to

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Kent Karlsson
Den 2011-11-20 20:50, skrev Peter Constable peter...@microsoft.com: Note that UTR 20 discusses semantic and presentation effects that are suitable for representation as characters versus markup and makes the point that, in XML, effects that involve spans of text should be represented using

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Philippe Verdy
2011/11/20 Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com: On 11/20/2011 8:00 AM, Joó Ádám wrote: Leaving aside that CSS is presentation and not content, and is definitely not markup. HTML is a better candidate. The details of the appearance of the mark would be presentation. The scoping, like for

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Martin J. Dürst
On 2011/11/21 5:54, Asmus Freytag wrote: On 11/20/2011 8:00 AM, Joó Ádám wrote: Leaving aside that CSS is presentation and not content, and is definitely not markup. HTML is a better candidate. Á The details of the appearance of the mark would be presentation. The scoping, like for applying

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-20 Thread Julian Bradfield
On 2011-11-21, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote: I completely disagree that these are presentation details in the example I supplied. This (composition of verses) is an essential part of the classical Latin poem presented, which is really intended to be read orally with a very precise

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-19 Thread Asmus Freytag
What is missing here is the recognition that having a *standard* way of expressing such features (text scoring) is desirable. Suggesting that this be left of one-off implementations or some markup language is not helpful to people interested in using such features. What is, of course. equally

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Ken Whistler
On 11/17/2011 11:28 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote: Could the Unicode text specify that a left half mark, when it is followed by a right half-mark on the same line, has to be joined ? And which character can we select in a font to mark the intermediate characters between them ? No. This kind of

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Peter Cyrus
Ken, you mention defined markup constructions, but nothing would prevent specialized rendering software from, for example, connecting a left half mark with the corresponding right half mark via titlo, even though the text is still only plain text with no markup, right? The titlo would simply not

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Ken Whistler
On 11/18/2011 11:21 AM, Peter Cyrus wrote: Ken, you mention defined markup constructions, but nothing would prevent specialized rendering software from, for example, connecting a left half mark with the corresponding right half mark via titlo, even though the text is still only plain text with

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Peter Cyrus
I mention it because I think plain text could at least indicate what _should_ display (instead of what *does* display), and a rich environment could make the same text look great. I think we'll all need for a long time more to write text that displays adequately as plain text in the absence of

RE: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Doug Ewell
imaginablePeter Cyrus pcyrus at alivox dot net wrote: I think we'll all need for a long time more to write text that displays adequately as plain text in the absence of even OpenType advancexd typography features. s/OpenType/rich-text/ or maybe s/OpenType/fancy-text/ Rich text is not

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Philippe Verdy
2011/11/18 Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com: On 11/17/2011 11:28 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote: Could the Unicode text specify that a left half mark, when it is followed by a right half-mark on the same line, has to be joined ? And which character can we select in a font to mark the intermediate

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Philippe Verdy
This example is also NOT a titlo. What I am looking for here, is the possibility of using a conjoining middle mark for connecting the two half marks of the inverted breve (in fact top create a long arc). But I cannot use the middle conjoining U+FE26 on the middle letter(s) with the U+FE20 and

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Ken Whistler
On 11/18/2011 5:24 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote: This arc in the example is definitely NOT mathematics Nor did I say it was. (even if you have read a version where it was attempted to represent it using a Math TeX notation in this page, an obvious error because it used an angular \widehat and

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Ken Whistler
On 11/18/2011 5:36 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote: I have absolutely no clear way to represent sequences like in this example that use such elongated diacritic applied to runs of more than two characters. Nor should you expect to be able to represent such things in plain text. Such conventions are

Re: missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-18 Thread Philippe Verdy
2011/11/19 Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com: On 11/18/2011 5:24 PM, Philippe Verdy wrote: This arc in the example is definitely NOT mathematics Nor did I say it was. (even if you have read a version where it was attempted to represent it using a Math TeX notation in this page, an obvious

missing characters: combining marks above runs of more than 2 base letters

2011-11-17 Thread Philippe Verdy
How can we encode long runs of characters surrounded by an inverted breve, when there are more than 2 characters in the run ? For now we can use combining half marks for macrons, but the conjoining behavior of the combining conjoining macron is not warrantied with womething else than half-marks