Ken,
you do not answer my mails concerning marks called
by the local communities "damma" and looking
exactly like a damma are encoded a second time
as arrowhead.
It is as if some letters were encoded a second
time accompanied by a nastaliq rendering
because Pakistani have a "clear preference"
for
> At this point, regarding the dammas in question, it is a matter
> ... of providing appropriate documentation of equivalence
> (or non-equivalence) in use and explaining when one might want
> to use one variant or another in text.
> --Ken
n3882> This character should be considered a variant of
2011/8/13 Ken Whistler :
> If a proposed character (or script or collection of symbols) is marked
> in yellow or green in that table, there is still a chance to provide
> feedback
> and potentially influence an encoding decision. But once a proposed
> character reaches ISO Stage 6 in that table (si
> At this point, regarding the dammas in question, it is a matter
> instead of providing appropriate documentation of equivalence
> (or non-equivalence) in use and explaining when one might want
> to use one variant or another in text.
> --Ken
Have I not shown clearly that there is not a normal
Ken Whistler> ... The "Guinean
Ken Whistler> damma with dot" is encoded as:
Ken Whistler> U+08FD ARABIC RIGHT ARROWHEAD ABOVE WITH DOT
Ken Whistler> Importantly, however, the issue is moot at this point. These
decisions were
Ken Whistler> taken some time ago, and the technical ballots have passe
On 8/12/2011 3:19 PM, Lorna Priest wrote:
Our original proposal had these unified, but for various reasons we
were asked to disunify them.
Lorna
Original Message
Subject: on proposed new Arab script characters for African lanugages
(n3882)
From: mmarx
To: unicode
Our original proposal had these unified, but for various reasons we were
asked to disunify them.
Lorna
Original Message
Subject: on proposed new Arab script characters for African lanugages
(n3882)
From: mmarx
To: unicode@unicode.org
Date: 8/12/2011 11:21 AM
I want to
7 matches
Mail list logo
