Re: [Unicon-group] Concurrency Features for Unicon

2004-01-21 Thread Steve Wampler
I thought I'd replied earlier, but it doesn't seem to have made it all the way to this list On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 12:45, Michael Meehan wrote: > Hello, > > I have been thinking about adding Concurrency features to Unicon. Below > are some ramblings on the subject. Cool - *very* cool... >

Re: [Unicon-group] Concurrency Features for Unicon

2004-01-21 Thread Federico Balbi
Threads looks cool. Somewhere I also read that forking processes in Linux for example is as efficient as threads. Cannot say the same for Solaris though. Federico Balbi Division of Computer Science University of Texas at San Antonio 6900 N. Loop 1604 West San Antonio, TX 78249-0667 [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Unicon-group] Concurrency Features for Unicon

2004-01-21 Thread Clint Jeffery
Concurrency in Icon has been studied; Kelvin Nilsen's Ph.D. dissertation was on an experimental system (Conicon, concurrent Icon) which was never released. Concurrency in Unicon as Michael proposes might be an excellent addition. Here are a few additional thoughts on his proposal. 1. making the

[Unicon-group] Concurrency Features for Unicon

2004-01-21 Thread Michael Meehan
Hello, I have been thinking about adding Concurrency features to Unicon. Below are some ramblings on the subject. Since Unicon assumes POSIX as its base, the obvious method for creating concurrency in Unicon is to utilize the POSIX threads package (Pthreads) within the i-code interpreter. In ord