Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On 07/24 01:25, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > > Running with GC.stress didn't catch the error for me. But I'm using a
> > > fairly old compiler (GCC 4.2.1, the OpenBSD default), so this may be
> > > something that
On 07/24 01:25, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > Running with GC.stress didn't catch the error for me. But I'm using a
> > fairly old compiler (GCC 4.2.1, the OpenBSD default), so this may be
> > something that only shows up on a newer compiler that does more
> >
Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Running with GC.stress didn't catch the error for me. But I'm using a
> fairly old compiler (GCC 4.2.1, the OpenBSD default), so this may be
> something that only shows up on a newer compiler that does more
> optimizations.
Pere: just curious if
On 07/15 12:56, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On 07/15 04:45, Eric Wong wrote:
> > Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > > All of Sequel's postgres adapter tests still pass with this, so I merged
> > > this into the master branch. I'll do some more testing of my apps, but
> > > unless I run into
On 07/15 04:45, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > All of Sequel's postgres adapter tests still pass with this, so I merged
> > this into the master branch. I'll do some more testing of my apps, but
> > unless I run into problems I plan to release this as sequel_pg
Jeremy Evans wrote:
> All of Sequel's postgres adapter tests still pass with this, so I merged
> this into the master branch. I'll do some more testing of my apps, but
> unless I run into problems I plan to release this as sequel_pg 1.7.1
> early next week.
Thanks for the
On 07/15 12:15, Eric Wong wrote:
> Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > Thanks for this patch. I'm not an RB_GC_GUARD expert, but the changes
> > look fine to me. The existing RB_GC_GUARD calls were added by me in
> > 2012 to fix an earlier segfault.[1] This is the first reported
> >
Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Thanks for this patch. I'm not an RB_GC_GUARD expert, but the changes
> look fine to me. The existing RB_GC_GUARD calls were added by me in
> 2012 to fix an earlier segfault.[1] This is the first reported
> RB_GC_GUARD-related segfault in sequel_pg
On 07/14 09:16, Eric Wong wrote:
> Pere Joan Martorell wrote:
> > I suspect that the conflicting gem was 'sequel_pg' (sequel_pg
> > overwrites the inner loop of the Sequel postgres adapter row fetching
> > code with a C version. The C version is significantly faster than
Pere Joan Martorell wrote:
> I suspect that the conflicting gem was 'sequel_pg' (sequel_pg
> overwrites the inner loop of the Sequel postgres adapter row fetching
> code with a C version. The C version is significantly faster than the
> pure ruby version that Sequel uses
+Cc: Philip and Jonathan since they encountered this three years
ago, but we never heard back from them:
https://bogomips.org/unicorn-public/?q=T_NODE+d:..20170713
Pere Joan Martorell wrote:
> >
Hi, I'm experimenting with a Rack application and Unicorn and I have a
random error occurring when upgrading my app. When upgrading (sending
a USR2 + QUIT signals), 10% of the times unicorn master process and
its 2 worker processes start and after serving the first request they
crash.
This the
12 matches
Mail list logo