Two days after her office had said Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell had no plans
to update the community about the Fenton-Knox affair in Malcolm X Park at the
First Thursday meeting, she showed up promptly and did just that. She went much
farther, angrily baring a serious rift between Univesrsity C
able to agree to participate in the forum?
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Anthony West
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:02 AM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: [UC] Blackwell calls to save Fenton's job
Two days after her office had
He's toast.
On Jun 7, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Anthony West wrote:
Two days after her office had said Councilwoman Jannie Blackwell
had no plans to update the community about the Fenton-Knox affair
in Malcolm X Park at the First Thursday meeting, she showed up
promptly and did just that. She wen
ion as I get it. If anyone on the listserv would
like to join the committee, e-mail me
off-list.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Sanderson
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:20 AM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Blackwe
r-up and a scapegoat!
Sincerely,
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: S. Sharrieff Ali
To: 'Bill Sanderson' ; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 1:56 PM
Subject: RE: [UC] Blackwell calls to save Fenton's job
Bill:
The motion carried and was wit
I left before the end of the meeting (in order to post this report and then
cover my day job). So I cannot testify for sure that they said nothing about it
after I left. But I left when the Councilwoman left, and they hadn't said much
by that point.
Bryan's position was made clear from the outs
ple.com
Subject: RE: [UC] Blackwell calls to save Fenton's job
Bill:
The motion carried and was without opposition to have a community meeting
organized by
"concerned community residents". I made the motion and volunteered to make
sure the meeting
happened. 20 people signed to
Indeed he is NOT. Glenn is beautiful people. Quite talented as a musician.
He¹s from quality West Philadelphia African-American stock such as his late
father who was known as, ³The Mayor of 52nd St.² Some of the ³Old Guard²,
longtime homeowners who valued school.
My parents and his were fighter
S. Sharrieff Ali wrote:
The motion carried and was without opposition to have a community
meeting organized by
"concerned community residents". I made the motion and volunteered to
make sure the meeting
happened. 20 people signed to participate in a committee to organize the
meeting.
...
The ide
Thanks Ray, I will introduce them at the organizing meeting.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 2:10 AM
To: University City List
Subject: Re: [UC] Blackwell calls to save Fenton's j
Tony, thank you for this thorough and important update. A question remains
about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
My guess, now, is that our anonymous poster, Committeeman7, is either
affiliated with the Councilwoman's office or has inside information from the
Councilwoman's of
I Googled Committeeman7 and did not find anything.
Jim Cummings
On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tony, thank you for this thorough and important update. A question remains
about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
My guess, now, is that our anonymous poster,
I believe the Councilwoman was sincere when she said on Tuesday she had not yet
made up her mind whether to attend First Thursday at all. Close of session is a
very busy time for Council Persons. So while the anonymous poster may have had
some connection with her organization, I don't believe he
I prefer attribution, but I understand why someone might not want to
expose themselves to the rampant paranoia, profligate speculation and
general nastiness that began to swirl around the 'offending' post, long
before a beginner might have twigged to list etiquette (or not) or a more
adept sender m
On 6/7/07, Elizabeth F Campion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer attribution, but I understand why someone might not want to
expose themselves to the rampant paranoia, profligate speculation and
general nastiness that began to swirl around the 'offending' post, long
before a beginner might ha
Ross,
I repeat, "I prefer attribution".
My further comment was MHO, that said writer might have good reason to
stay quiet and avoid any association with the straw figure, held up for
immolation, by you and others.
What may have been an oversight has been so roundly pounded beyond
recognition, and
On 6/7/07, Elizabeth F Campion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Committeeman7 did nothing wrong!
He/she/it did something very wrong -- posted an anonymous message that not
only "annoyed" the listserve but caused a whole lot of trouble, igniting a
firefight and gangbang that resulted in a huge amou
Ross,
The only posts with inarguable intent to annoy were those who demand the
right to 'out' or badger C-7.
I still consider the original post and accurate and timely invitation to
a community meeting that was more lively than most.
Sorry,
your need to know
inability to let go
On 6/7/07, Elizabeth F Campion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ross,
The only posts with inarguable intent to annoy were those who demand the
right to 'out' or badger C-7.
I still consider the original post and accurate and timely invitation to a
community meeting that was more lively than most.
19 matches
Mail list logo
