is this item regarding architectural eyesores, and the proposal to
designate them X-- as in, we wanna tear this fugly pile'o'stucco down.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/30/arts/design/30grad.html?ex=1251604800en=f927b2dc5b07df9cei=5090partner=rssuserland
In a message dated 9/2/2004 10:15:46 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/30/arts/design/30grad.html?ex=1251604800en=f927b2dc5b07df9cei=5090partner=rssuserland
Interesting piece. Perhaps the key point (for those who want to skip the
long, boring
From: Brian Siano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 09:22:16 -0400
is this item regarding architectural eyesores, and the proposal to
designate them X-- as in, we wanna tear this fugly pile'o'stucco down.
Perhaps not as contrary as it seems. All of his examples of
From: Dubin, Elisabeth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:06:25 -0400
I wonder how
Ferguson proposes to seize private property-- a kind of Eminent Domain
for the Eradication of Ugly?
The government would provide a grant to developers to help defray the
cost of
In a message dated 9/2/2004 12:30:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We can't
let ourselves be thought of aselitist arbiters of good taste, lest we have
no rebuttal when Al Krigmanposts an email.Here's an excerpt from a
piece I wrote in 2000
[snip]
We're in
the
