ighborhood controversy since UCD arrived, the pattern and
arguments for secrecy are the same.Best,Glenn -Original Message-
From: mcget...@aol.com
Sent: Apr 12, 2010 2:39 PM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] FOCP response
Does anyone know why Mr. Chance does not subscribe to t
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Glenn moyer glen...@earthlink.net wrote:
Does anyone know why Mr. Chance does not subscribe to this listserve?
Mary,
Yes, I do.
Like Mr. West and Mr. Siano, he believes in concentrated power. He does
not believe in public notification, inclusion of the
@list.purple.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 7:42 am
Subject: [UC] FOCP response
Sorry, I forwarded this response from FOCP earlier but it did not get posted:
Responses from FOCP, Mr Chance:
Glenn--
Your issue remains moot. If you want to post that interpretation anywhere feel
free to do so
-Original Message-
From: Glenn glen...@earthlink.net
To: univcity@list.purple.com UnivCity@list.purple.com
UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 7:42 am
Subject: [UC] FOCP response
Sorry, I forwarded this response from FOCP earlier but it did not get posted
UnivCity@list.purple.com
UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 11, 2010 7:42 am
Subject: [UC] FOCP response
Sorry, I forwarded this response from FOCP earlier but it did not get
posted:
Responses from FOCP, Mr Chance:
Glenn--
Your issue remains moot. If you want to post
The FOCP refused my request for the minutes of their election. Below is
the initial response. Once again, rules only apply to those outside of
the insular inner FOCP gang.
Robert's Rules is very specific for good reason. The example, that even
unanimous consent about some minor issue, is
Sorry, I forwarded this response from FOCP earlier but it did not get
posted:
Responses from FOCP, Mr Chance:
Glenn--
Your issue remains moot. If you want to post that interpretation
anywhere feel free to do so.
