distorted.
Karen Allen
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:41:20 -0400
From: glen...@earthlink.net
CC: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Facts on the Clark Pk restoration
On 5/4/2011 11:24 PM, Anthony West wrote:
There has been a lot of hooraw on this list of late about Clark Park, which
began
On 5/4/2011 11:24 PM, Anthony West wrote:
There has been a lot of hooraw on this list of late about Clark Park,
which began with a recent post of misinformation on this listserve
from a well-known source of nutty falsehoods. The latest round began
with his report on chemical treatments
Good responses here Glenn. Perhaps the reason they did not let my email
through yet is the inclusion there of this list's subscription info. Even
Linda Lee did not (dare?) mention it before when I asked, I had to google it
and then hunt it down like a detective... Clark Park now looks like a
On May 5, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Richard Conrad wrote:
Good responses here Glenn. Perhaps the reason they did not let my email
through yet is the inclusion there of this list's subscription info. Even
Linda Lee did not (dare?) mention it before when I asked, I had to google it
and then hunt
I must say Rick flatters me.
As of today (as anyone can see who looks at me), I look quite a bit
older than I did 10 years ago, when the community first began pushing to
revitalize Clark Park.
The park, on the other hand, is looking much younger all of a sudden.
And that's good! The park
There has been a lot of hooraw on this list of late about Clark Park,
which began with a recent post of misinformation on this listserve from
a well-known source of nutty falsehoods. The latest round began with his
report on chemical treatments involved in the rehabilitation of the
North Park
