[UC] Fw: Re: [phillyblocks] HB1954????????

2005-01-21 Thread Mark Krull
-Forwarded Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Jan 21, 2005 4:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [phillyblocks] HB1954 Pat, the trouble is that Bill 1954 is not at all clear.  If I amrepresenting a community group whose standing is challenged, I will

Re: [UC] Fw: Re: [phillyblocks] HB1954????????

2005-01-22 Thread Krfapt
See the opposition to the indicated provision of Bill 1954 for what it is. A power play by people who appoint themselves as community leaders by becoming active in organizations nobody else cares about. And who are worried about losing the influence they so badly want to have.   The words "de

Re: [UC] Fw: Re: [phillyblocks] HB1954????????

2005-01-22 Thread Elliot M. Stern
Thanks, Al, that really clarifies the issue. Detrimentally harmed means detrimentally harmed. Elliot On 22 Jan 2005, at 07:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The words "detrimentally harmed" are unambiguous. Either someone (or his or her "agent" -- which may be a community group of which the some