In a message dated 7/31/2007 3:16:45 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Glenn wrote:
Since you're still on the UC list, Brian, you must have received my request
to substantiate the incivility you showed a few days back about "Al Krigman's
mean-spirited rants." So far,
Glenn wrote:
When I was banned from FOCP in 2004, the king easily got away with
it. On the list when the king e-bullies Ray, people can study what he
is doing and he can't get away with it.
Glenn is not banned, nor has he ever been banned, from membership in the
FoCP. This is a lie.
Under ou
x27;m not informed how other internet ugliness works. Boy oh boy,
do I understand district ugliness on list or in person.
Respectfully,
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: Al Airone
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 7:55
<>
Amen!
Al Airone
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: [UC] Incorrigible list leaders
Yes, I too, agree with this thoughtful and well-written assessment
100%. Thank you .
Well, maybe 95%...
It works my last nerve, but I use the "delete" button when I see
certain names over and over again.
I still believe in the "delete" key, but it's getting more and more
difficult!
I support this point totally.
S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 8:35 AM
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: [UC] Incorrigible list leaders
I totally disagree Frank, unless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 7:24 am
Subject: Re: [UC] Incorrigible list leaders
Hey buddy,
Good to hear from you. Let me try to respond to some of
your thoughts in your last two posts.
I can understand your frustrations with these folks
gt;
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:07 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Incorrigible list leaders
Have you been out in public in the last few years? This is SOP for the majority
of the population as far as I'm concerned. This list is almost reserved in
comparison.
> Paul, thank you. I also agree with what you have said.
>
> The list has gotten to be very frustrating, and I have been thinking of
> leaving it. I delete most messages without reading them as it is. I stay
> because between all of the __(fill in the blank yourself), there is
> valuable info
ally are
on a public unmoderated list. It makes that delete key seem like the best
option for a community discussion list. Take care.
Your buddy,
Glenn
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 9:42 PM
Subjec
I find it encouraging to hear you, Paul, speak about trying to work with the
existing structure and gather comments from other Listserv-ers that might
improve the product.
My personal feeling is also to try to work with the existing structure and
try to tweak it to improve the issues that h
Have you been out in public in the last few years? This is SOP for
the majority of the population as far as I'm concerned. This list is
almost reserved in comparison.
Frankus
Sleek. Edgy. Infinitely flexible.
On Jul 29, 2007, at 03:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What bothers me is the lack
On Jul 29, 2007, at 9:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is everything fine with this list or not? If it's fine, we disagree.
If its not fine, what do you propose?
It's never fine, but it is what it is. And it could be better.
1) If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything.
2)
: is everything fine with this list or not?? If it's fine, we
disagree.? If its not fine, what do you propose?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Kimm Tynan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 9:04 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Incorrigible li
Bravo. Very well said.
Kimm
On 7/29/07 3:31 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neighbors,
> As is typical for our list, people are tending to exaggerate on both ends
> of the issue: either there is no issue (characterized by the "that's what the
> delete button is for def
Neighbors,
??? As is typical for our list, people are tending to exaggerate on both ends
of the issue: either there is no issue (characterized by the "that's what the
delete button is for defense" which posits that anything goes is a suitable
standard of conduct) or that the new list is anti-dem
16 matches
Mail list logo
