Tax assessor mails notices
By MARK McDONALD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])   215-854-2646
 
The city's tax assessor yesterday began mailing 413,000  property-assessment 
notices that could increase the city's multibillion-dollar  real-estate tax 
base by 8 percent.  
For residential-property owners, the average assessment increase for 2008  
will raise tax bills by an average of $77 a year, according to a spokesman for  
the Board of Revision of Taxes.  
About 60 percent of the estimated $46 million in new property- tax revenue  
would go to the beleaguered city school system, while the rest would flow into  
the city's general fund.  
The volume of assessment changes is the largest since 2002, when more than  
270,000 notices were sent out. That volume and the size of the tax payments  
touched off a spate of taxpayer challenges and failed attempts by City Council  
to freeze assessments.  
In the last two years, assessment increases have been limited to about 40,000 
 properties a year as the revision board developed a controversial "full 
value"  assessment system, which it has yet to implement.  
The board is now under the chairmanship of Charlesretta Meade, a veteran  
board member who replaced retiring David Glancey last spring. Meade was not  
available for questions yesterday. That job was turned over to a  
public-relations 
firm.  
The assessment notices have no connection to the board's ongoing work toward  
establishing the "full value" method of assessing the city's 576,000 
properties,  based on a real market values and not the current fractional 
system, 
board  spokesman Pete Peterson said.  
"The status of full value is one where the board is looking to implement  
possibly in the future," he said.  
Industrial properties will see an average tax increase of $1,251, and  
commercial properties with residences above them will see an average $481 tax  
hike. 
Other commercial properties will see an average increase of $1,706,  Peterson 
said.  
A revision board news release said assessments on 6 percent of properties  
will decrease. Also, one third of properties will have a tax hit of $50 or 
less, 
 and 86 percent of properties will have increases of less than $200, it said. 
 
In the residential area, Peterson said, "The locations that will be most  
impacted will be Chestnut Hill and Center City areas."  
About 1,841 residential-property owners will face tax increases of $1,000 or  
more, he said.  
Councilman Frank DiCicco, who represents part of Center City, said he'd been  
informed that the revision board had as a matter of policy decided to limit  
residential-assessment increases to between 7 percent and 7.5 percent.  
Councilman Frank Rizzo, who lives in Chestnut Hill, said he will help city  
residents appeal their increases to the Board of View.  
As for the assessment hit in tony Chestnut Hill, Rizzo said, "There certainly 
 was an appreciation of property [values], but now I think we're starting to 
see  a change in the values. They're getting softer."  
If the proposed assessments were developed months ago, Rizzo suggested, the  
board may have to start over, given the recent downturn in the real-estate  
market. 





************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at 
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

Reply via email to