sort of organized protest is greatly diminished as well.
WRZ
Original Message Follows
From: KAREN ALLEN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:34:12 +
It's all inhumane, but even in a war, a distinction can be made between
: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:34:12 +
It's all inhumane, but even in a war, a distinction can be made between
casualties of war and cold-blooded murder. Not only is there a distinction
between the deaths of thousands of Iraqis vs. Mr. Berg
Message Follows
From: sunzoo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 16:12:45 -0400
Karen,
But do the Rules of War apply to an irregular guerilla force, one
that is outmanned and outgunned by a factor of 100, fighting off an
occupying army
of organized protest is greatly diminished as well.
WRZ
Original Message Follows
From: KAREN ALLEN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:34:12 +
It's all inhumane, but even in a war, a distinction can be made
between
casualties
From: KAREN ALLEN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:34:12 +
It's all inhumane, but even in a war, a distinction can be made
between
casualties of war and cold-blooded murder. Not only is there a
distinction
From: Dan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Dan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 23:21:06 -0400
I don't know how any of you could watch such a clip. I have been trying to
avoid this awful ugly topic
William H. Magill wrote:
And don't forget -- that tremendous loss of life in the Civil War was
entirely Lincoln's fault. With no provocation, he declared war on The
South and INVADED them! -- All the Southerners wanted to do was secede
so that they could maintain their way of life. They had no
On May 19, 2004, at 4:22 PM, John Ellingsworth wrote:
Doesn't look edited to me.
So the missing 11 hours? The tape jumps from 2:40 to 13:45?
-andy diller
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the
list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see
On 19 May, 2004, at 14:20, Brian Siano wrote:
In the case of Nick Berg, the various pages I've seen on these
suspicions argue that the _timing_ is suspicious. Right after we're
revulsed at the photos coming out of Abu Ghraib, this videotape
emerges to shock us the other way-- so, it's argued,
William H. Magill wrote:
On 19 May, 2004, at 14:20, Brian Siano wrote:
No, the timing that the news story broke soon after the revelations
about Abu Ghraib prison. The argument is that this tape has made
people angry at terrorists just when people were really angry over
the prison, so the tape
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [UC] Political Commentary: W Saying Sorry
On May 19, 2004, at 4:22 PM, John Ellingsworth wrote:
Doesn't look edited to me.
So the missing 11 hours? The tape jumps from 2:40 to 13:45?
-andy diller
You are receiving
11 matches
Mail list logo
