In a message dated 3/12/2007 4:31:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A religious group here in University City is asking the Philadelphia
government to deny a zoning use of a property based on religious law.
They may be motivated by their religious beliefs. As I
In a message dated 3/12/07 4:43:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I may be wrong on this, of course, I'll certainly stand corrected if you
have proof otherwise. But religious law is not the basis of the stated
opposition to the granting of a zoning variance as presented in the arguments
by
In a message dated 3/12/2007 4:48:03 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, MLamond
writes:
What is the stated opposition?
You're the one who said it was based on religious beliefs. So back up your
claim. Maybe there wasn't any stated opposition (I didn't go to the hearing so
I don't know what
In a message dated 3/12/2007 4:14:08 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
relevance to the zoning decision about the move of the Wine Spirits
Shoppe from 41st Market to 4237 Walnut, where a religious group across the
street doesn't want it
In a message dated 3/12/07
In a message dated 3/12/2007 5:14:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, MLamond
writes:
Now, I'm sure the list has heard enough of this dialogue, so I'm going to
drop it.
That's a good idea. Because there's an aphorism to the effect that when
you're digging yourself deeper and deeper into a
