The Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation were referred to a
few times in the review meeting. I was surprised to see that they're actually
quite concise, though obviously open to interpretation. Standard 9 was the
source for John Gallery's objections:
Here are two more things to consider as the list debates the 40th
Pine/Baltimore location for a restored Italianate building and an extended stay
hotel.
As I understand it, when the property was purchased in 2004, no one involved
knew that the building was on the local register, so they
how about a historic looking Taco Bell?
**
See what's new at http://www.aol.com
___
ucneighbors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.asc.upenn.edu/mailman/listinfo/ucneighbors
You are
In a message dated 10/24/2007 1:31:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I understand it, when the property was purchased in 2004, no one involved
knew that the building was on the local register, so they weren't
anticipating renovation costs for the Italianate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I understand it, when the property was purchased in 2004, no one
involved knew that the building was on the local register, so they
weren't anticipating renovation costs for the Italianate house. And
I've been told that they
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone suggest other possible uses for it?
I already suggested this, onlist (and I was being sincere):
what about using the existing historic building as a
quaint bed and breakfast (complete with bike rental shop
and rental space for community functions), and
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:20:30 -0400To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: [Ucneighbors] Re: [UC] Secretary of the Interior's standards
for rehabAs I understand it, when the property was purchased in 2004, no one
involved knew that the building was on the local
of the Interior's
standards for rehab well, I don't know nuttin' 'bout nuttin', but it
looks like uchs's own website lists the house as being on the national
register for historic places, june 22, 1979
http://www.uchs.net/HistoricDistricts/hamfamest.html HAMILTON FAMILY
ESTATE (4000
and that renovation costs for the house are expected
to be over $3 million. So I think we can take
restore it as a single family house off of the list
of possible options for it.
Melani,
Penn decided to mothball this building for three
years. It was a functioning building and it's closure
had
On 24 Oct 2007, at 2:57 PM, KAREN ALLEN wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:20:30 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: [Ucneighbors] Re: [UC] Secretary of the Interior's
standards for rehab
As I understand it, when the property
10 matches
Mail list logo
