Hmm, that's one good guess ... minus the assumption there's something
wrong about getting paid overtime for working overtime. I'm not the
slightest bit bothered by the notion that a person who heaves garbage
for a living might want to call it quits after 8 hr, and ask for a bit
more if you want
istserv
Sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 7:21 pm
Subject: [UC] Talking trash (Was: Re: Illegal trash update)
Hmm, that's one good guess ... minus the assumption there's something
wrong about getting paid overtime for working overtime. I'm not the
slightest bit bothered by the notio
e carrying
out the normal demands of the job.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 9:26 pm
Subject: Re: [UC] Talking trash (Was: Re: Illegal trash update)
Dave, if you think people don't deserve time and a half for
The regular pick-up day for the Friday route during a week with a holiday is
definitely Saturday. I used to run into this all the time (and others do
now) while working at the Partnership recycling site.
Applauds to Andy Frischkoff for his comments. City workers (I'm one) are
people, too!
L
On Jan 26, 2008 2:52 AM, Dave Axler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul:
>
> Actually, I'm not opposed to folks being paid time and a half when they
> work more than 40 hours in the week, if they are paid on an hourly basis. I
> don't know if that's the case for Streets Dept. employees, at any le
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 2:52 am
Subject: Re: [UC] Talking trash (Was: Re: Illegal trash update)
Paul:
Actually, I'm not opposed to folks being paid time and a half when they work
more than 40 hours in the we
TED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Sent: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:32 am
Subject: Re: [UC] Talking trash (Was: Re: Illegal trash update)
On Jan 26, 2008 2:52 AM, Dave Axler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul:
>
> Actually, I'm not opposed to folks being paid time and a half wh
