In a message dated 6/23/2007 12:22:35 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ray, will you or someone else PLEASE explain to me EXACTLY what Lewis Wendell - his name is not Wendell Lewis - did, which would make it appropriate for him to resign? Not what happened, but what part of it he, Lewis Wendell, caused to happen? This question is so bereft of understanding of organizational dynamics, organizational structure, and corporate responsibility that your question must be a red herring. The event involving John Fenton is another indicator of Omar Blaik's and U Penn corporate council's failure to establish and effectively promulgate consistent and lawful operational guidelines. Additionally, what makes anyone think this type of incident has not happened before? Only, this time the candidate was not the powers that be's darling? And what having a new director would change, for those who don't like the UCD? There have been three directors; those who don't like the UCD have disliked all three. You can say categorically everyone disliked Paul Steinke? I don't think so. So please help me to see how a new director would be an improvement. The UCD needs new direction. This is also an opportunity to note that many of the recent posts lamented the possible loss of services to area residents, not the possible professional and financial plight of the Fenton Family. Nice to see what kind of caring sharing community the UCD spawned along with just some of their independent marketing agents. Ciao, Craig ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
