Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-12 Thread William H. Magill
On 11 Mar, 2004, at 18:06, William Zardus wrote: In a lot of instances, 2 workers with much more costly educations are working 80 hours or more to have the same standard of living that a prior generation had with one income. This is called inflation. It began with the Oil embargo in 1972 and

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-11 Thread William Zardus
PROTECTED] Reply-To: Charles H. Buchholtz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Miller) CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ... Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 18:48:35 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Miller) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:00:46 -0500

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-11 Thread William Zardus
OK Monique. Would it be better to send the terms of surrender directly to you or to the entire list ? WRZ Original Message Follows From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: William Zardus [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-10 Thread William Zardus
: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ... Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:37:30 -0500 Like I said below: :I guess a few people reading this are going to fly off the handle and I really don't care. What I am asking for is a scholarly and documented response. I don't think because I spend a few

[UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-10 Thread David Miller
I have to agree with Mr. Zardus. Back in the 50's, 60's and 70's middle class/working class families could live comfortably on (1) salary. Now, it seems these same households require (2) salaries to keep afloat. How is that getting richer? It seems almost criminal to me. Plus, who would

affording houses in west philly (Was RE: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ... )

2004-03-10 Thread Kyle Cassidy
William Zardus said: The poor are definitely getting poorer and same sex marriages will add to the overall effect. I must say, I completely agree. All those guys with two incomes and no kids will rocket into the upper reaches of the income brackets leaving all the hetero's, forced to bear

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-10 Thread Monique . M . Harvey
...I give up. That's it - I can't take anymore. M. M. Harvey, MPP, MPH You are receiving this because you are subscribed to the list named UnivCity. To unsubscribe or for archive information, see http://www.purple.com/list.html.

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-09 Thread Richard Moreau
'...disparate people...'? '...meltdowns...'? I didn't sign up for any of that stuff. I subscribed to this list thinking it was a bunch of like-minded Stepford folkies who would reaffirm my quirky longings for cookie cutter Victoriana and off-leash dogs pooping in tot lots. That's what I call a

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-09 Thread Richard Moreau
If that's the problem, what do you suggest for a solution? -Ricky On Mar 9, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Samuel Nicolary wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Vincent/Roger wrote: Andrew, I don't really know the statistics about whether the poor are getting poorer or not over the years. The situation seems

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-09 Thread Samuel Nicolary
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Richard Moreau wrote: If that's the problem, what do you suggest for a solution? I guess I used the word problem because Roger did - I believe it would be more accurate to say that it is simply a human condition arrived at by millions of years of evolution in the form of an

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-09 Thread Brian Siano
Samuel Nicolary wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Richard Moreau wrote: If that's the problem, what do you suggest for a solution? I guess I used the word problem because Roger did - I believe it would be more accurate to say that it is simply a human condition arrived at by millions of years

Re: [UC] not comprehending: Taxes in perspective ...

2004-03-09 Thread Samuel Nicolary
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Brian Siano wrote: Samuel Nicolary wrote: On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Richard Moreau wrote: If that's the problem, what do you suggest for a solution? I guess I used the word problem because Roger did - I believe it would be more accurate to say that it is