RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-23 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
become you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:44 PM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch? In a message dated 4/22

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-22 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 4/22/2007 7:29:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone private-mailed me and accused me of “dime-dropping” on the “whoever ” with LI and asked me to post a clarification. Are you stating a participant on this listserv tried to intimidate you

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-22 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Dear Craig, Thanks for the info, but it might be important to know that the city does not cede the right of walkway to the existence of or desire for trees. Most residential blocks in the city require a paved walkway that is 5' wide. Many commercial blocks require more width. The largest