[Bug 398974] Re: path to builder joined using + in pbuilder-dist

2010-11-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor) -- path to builder joined using + in pbuilder-dist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398974 You received this bug

[Bug 671067] Re: pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs()

2010-11-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Stefano Rivera (stefanor) -- pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs()

[Bug 671067] Re: pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs()

2010-11-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~stefanor/ubuntu-dev-tools/pbuilder-dist-refactor -- pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671067 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu. --

[Bug 671067] Re: pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs()

2010-11-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
I'll add friendlier errors for this, but the real issue here is probably that ~/pbuilder is owned by root, not your user. The symptoms and workaround you describe are probably not a bug. -- pbuilder-dist crashed with OSError in makedirs() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/671067 You received this

[Bug 398974] Re: path to builder joined using + in pbuilder-dist

2010-11-24 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~stefanor/ubuntu-dev-tools/pbuilder-dist-refactor -- path to builder joined using + in pbuilder-dist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398974 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu. --

[Bug 681114] [NEW] [pull-lp-source] has problems with packages that contains '-' in its name

2010-11-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools pull-lp-source has problems with packages that contains '-' in its name. For example: pull-lp-source qemu-kvm will download a file called qemu-kvm_0.13.0%2Bnoroms-0ubuntu7.dsc. The other pull-* script may be affected too. ** Affects:

[Bug 620721] Re: edit-patch should take -p and -P options

2010-11-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist -- edit-patch should take -p and -P options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620721 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu. --

[Bug 681119] [NEW] [wrap-and-sort] add an option to sort binary package sections in debian/control

2010-11-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools Please add an option to sort binary package sections in debian/control. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged **

[Bug 681131] [NEW] [wrap-and-sort] support sorting Architecture list

2010-11-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools Please support sorting the Architecture field list in wrap-and-sort. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Triaged ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged **

[Bug 681114] Re: [pull-lp-source] has problems with package versions that contains '-'

2010-11-24 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Summary changed: - [pull-lp-source] has problems with packages that contains '-' in its name + [pull-lp-source] has problems with package versions that contains '-' ** Description changed: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools - pull-lp-source has problems with packages that contains

[Bug 681242] [NEW] [sponsor-patch] Support building with sbuild

2010-11-24 Thread Evan Broder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools I use sbuild instead of pbuilder. I would be more likely to use sponsor- patch if there was an option (or even better, a configuration flag) to make it use sbuild. ** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist