[Bug 787051] [NEW] mk-sbuild is untruthful

2011-05-23 Thread Iain Lane
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools mk-sbuild puts a comment in .sbuildrc saying # Name to use as override in .changes files for the Maintainer: field # (mandatory, no default!). but this is not true. You can leave that out (and indeed probably should). sbuild then

[Bug 785973] Re: [bitsize] code unreachable

2011-05-23 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Branch linked: lp:~dholbach/ubuntu-dev-tools/bitesize-fix ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Holbach (dholbach) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful

2011-05-23 Thread Emmet Hikory
Rather, it's just outdated. There's some other cruft in there (for instance, the current created sbuild.conf entries will generate deprecation warnings, and they should have been put in conf.d anyway to avoid maintainer script merge issues). I don't know that it's worth fixing it: mk-sbuild

[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful

2011-05-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu-dev-tools -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful

2011-05-23 Thread Stefano Rivera
According to persia, this was once necessary. Fixing for now. mk-sbuild will hopefully go away soon ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu- dev-tools/+spec/other-o-udt-upstreaming ) ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools

[Bug 786370] Re: ubuntu-dev-tools should recommend quilt debhelper

2011-05-23 Thread Stefano Rivera
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786370 Title: ubuntu-dev-tools should recommend quilt

[Bug 786370] Re: ubuntu-dev-tools should recommend quilt debhelper

2011-05-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
As discussed in the merge proposal and on IRC, we should create a metapackage packaging-dev that depends on everything a packager needs instead of bloating ubuntu-dev-tools. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)

[Bug 787051] Re: mk-sbuild is untruthful

2011-05-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787051 Title: mk-sbuild is untruthful --

[Bug 785973] Re: [bitsize] code unreachable

2011-05-23 Thread Benjamin Drung
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785973 Title: [bitsize] code unreachable --