Hello Fabrice,
here's the new diff.gz, including fixes to changelog entry and
debian/control file, as well as whatsnew.txt now in debian (rules
updated accordingly).
Package builds on both karmic (pbuilder on my box) and lucid (see my
PPA, I had to bump to 0ubuntu2 to avoid conflict with previous
Hello Fabrice,
retrieving whatsnew.txt from the net is just a quick fix for the current
release. Upstream maintainers didn't bother to repack the zipfile, but
it will be back with 0.137. Putting whatsnew.txt in debian would require
some changes in debian/rules. If you feel it would be cleaner, ho
Hello Fabrice,
the NOASM make variable selects which emulation engine to use. For all
the targets currently supported by Ubuntu is recommended unsetting it,
to take full advantage of the Assembly core when available. On the other
hand, there are other targets (e.g. ARM or MIPS, according to the
u
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.136.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.136-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.136
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.136.orig.tar.gz
and th
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: sdlmame
New SDLMAME upstream 0.136 needs packaging.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.136
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502191
You received this bug notification
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.135.
A fixed watch file as suggested by Fabrice is included.
To build the source package use:
zcat sdlmame_0.135-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.135
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.135.orig.ta
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 403212 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403212
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 403212
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.134
--
sdlmame new upstream: 0.134
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444792
You received this bug notification
Hello Fabrice,
and thanks for your help.
1. I agree, the watch file should not track "u"nstable releases. I'll
put it very high in my to-do list. :)
2. No, 0.133 and 0.134 are so called "stable" (major) releases. Mame
developers agreed to a tight development cycle, with each release
planned in
Please DON'T upload Artur Rona's package.
SDLMAME 0.134u1 is a beta release, it can be even broken at some extent,
and speaking as the official maintainer, I strongly believe only major
releases are safe enough to reach the repository.
I'll upload 0.134 as soon as possible. With feature freeze i
I know work is in progress to let sdlmame enter the official debian
repository, and when it's done we can see whether diversion is needed.
In the meantime, I see no reason to sync the official package with an
unofficial repository for debian.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream release 0.133
https
untu1.diff.gz
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.133.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.133-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.133
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.133.orig.tar.gz
and t
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Summary changed:
- New upstream release 0.133
+ [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
** Summary changed:
- [upgrade] New upstream release 0.133
+ [upgrade]
Please don't change either description or tags, they are used by sponsors to
process sponsoring queue.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Sponsorship/SponsorsQueue
** Summary changed:
- [karmic] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
+ [upgrade] Please update btpd to 0.15 version
** Tags added: patch
** Summary changed:
- Update BTPD version to 0.15
+ [upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
--
[upgrade] Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => New
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Cesare Falco (c.falco) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: btpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.lau
Released tagged with a "u" are unstable ones, very similar to beta.
I'm not going to package them as they seldom even break working code.
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.132.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.132-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.132
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.132.orig.tar.gz
and t
Public bug reported:
A new upstream release is available.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] New upstream release 0.132
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390157
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
ee: (unassigned) => Cesare Falco (c.falco)
--
Update BTPD version to 0.15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
Here's some explanation:
> - ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium-mmx \
> + ARCHOPTS=-march=pentium2 \
sdlmame requires fast machines or it runs so slow it's unusable; optimization
for i686 offers some performance improvement (comment put in changelog)
> -Standards-Version: 3.7.3
> +Standards-Version: 3.8.0
Could anyone please sponsor sdlmame 0.129?
Feature Freeze is approaching and I'm concerned it could miss it... :)
Thanks!
Cesare.
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-
** Changed in: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@l
This is the .diff file for the new upstream release - sdlmame 0.128.
To build the source package use
zcat sdlmame_0.129-0ubuntu1.diff.gz | patch -p0
cd sdlmame-0.129
chmod +x debian/rules
debian/rules get-orig-source
mv sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz ../
cd ..
tar xvfz sdlmame_0.129.orig.tar.gz
and t
Public bug reported:
A new upstream has been released.
** Affects: sdlmame (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
[upgrade] sdlmame new upstream 0.129
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318304
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This is a duplicate of Bug #119412
--
[needs-packaging] MAC-PORT
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105461
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a bug assignee.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis
27 matches
Mail list logo
