Fixed in 1.2.4-2
** Changed in: ncurses-ruby (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
wrong argument type error when calling stdscr methods
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371384
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: reportbug
When reporting bug to the Debian BTS, it is a bad idea to report bugs
against a version of the package that is not in Debian. That causes
version-tracking to fail, and unhappy maintainers.
I suggest adding a message in the default template
** Changed in: libjson-ruby (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
libjson-ruby is incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161210
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: libnarray-ruby (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
ruby module narray installed in the wrong directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118480
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
fixed in lucid
** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Bump to p376 to fix CVE-2009-4124
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498665
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: mpich2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
mpi.h not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
OK, I finally prepared an SRU to fix all the mpich2 issues, including
this one. Patch attached.
Changelog:
mpich2 (1.2-1ubuntu1.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low
.
* The package uploaded just before the karmic release was done in a
hurry. This update fixes several issues that were missed
I prepared a SRU for this bug, based on my NMU of the openmpi debian
package.
The patch syncs the alternative code with was is done in the Debian
package.
Changelog:
openmpi (1.3.2-3ubuntu1.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low
.
* SRU to backport the alternatives fix from the Debian NMU
Marking as fix released since the package was accepted in Debian.
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Push to debian the ubuntu-dev-tools that are relevant for them
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439906
You received this bug notification
Yes, known problem. Please either:
- use the mpich2 package from lucid (version 1.2.1-1)
- or run mpd instead of using mpdboot
I'll try to prepare a SRU for karmic, but I'm very busy currently
--
problem with mpich2 after upgrade ubuntu 9.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488109
You received
@Mauricio: http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=mpich2
--
problem with mpich2 after upgrade ubuntu 9.10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/488109
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
is not supported in lucid ; dropping from Architectures = allows to sync
the package.
Changelog entries since current lucid version 1.3.2-3ubuntu1:
openmpi (1.3.3-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload with the maintainer's permission.
* Improve alternatives upgrade.
-- Lucas
alternatives score to 40 (same as OpenMPI).
* Fix FTBFS on s390 by using -fPIC instead of -fpic. Closes: #555943.
* Remove .py binary suffix in /usr/share/mpich2/*.py.
* Run the test suite, but ignore failures for now.
-- Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:37:30
-0600
status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
libmpich2-dev
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
different bug, already known.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
On 30/10/09 at 07:52 -, pemr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, now I have found mpi.mod.
but
$apt-file search mpi.mod
still give nothing about this file in mpich2
apt-file update?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
be search in
this way either.
apt-file update.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
mpi.h not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434039
You received this bug notification because you
Unfortunately, fixing this bug is going to require some effort. I've
just filed http://bugs.debian.org/552429 so we can decide on the best
course of action.
In the meantime, you can run:
update-alternatives --remove-all mpirun
update-alternatives --remove-all mpiexec
That will make the
** Changed in: mpich2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
mpi.h not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
it works for me. Can you provide an example program, command line and
output that fails ?
--
mpi.h not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434039
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
package seems also
have this problem.
ps. I do installed all related packages , including dev packages.
please run dpkg -l | grep mpich and post the output.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D
many head files are missing.
Yes, you are still using the old (known broken) version. Use
1.2-2ubuntu1.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
mpi.h not found
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Hi Dustin,
I'm the mpich2 maintainer in Debian.
mpich2 just went out of NEW. I'm not sure yet whether it is correct, but it at
least look in a better state than the mpich2 package in Ubuntu.
Maybe it's worth taking a look, and shipping instead of the currently broken
mpich2 package?
--
ruby1.9.1 is in karmic.
** Changed in: ruby1.9 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ruby1.9
ruby1.9 1.9.0.5-1 fails to build on i386.
** Affects: ruby1.9 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
ruby1.9 fails to build on i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/443044
You received this bug notification because you are
It's caused by -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, and only affects i386. Patch attached.
** Attachment added: ruby1.9_1.9.0.5+ftbfs-fix-fortify-source.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33025414/ruby1.9_1.9.0.5%2Bftbfs-fix-fortify-source.diff
--
ruby1.9 fails to build on i386
).
That information is included in debian/copyright.
* debian/patches/090803_exclude_rdoc.dpatch: ported from the ruby1.9.1
package.
* debian/control: Added misc depends.
* debian/compat: Bumpled up the version to 7.
[ Lucas Nussbaum ]
* New upstream release.
+ *.inc updated
) unstable; urgency=low
[ Lucas Nussbaum ]
* Removed Fumitoshi UKAI u...@debian.or.jp from Uploaders. Thanks a
lot for the past help!
* Removed obsolete Build-Conflicts: on gcc-3.3 ( 1:3.3.2-0pre1)
* Add ${misc:Depends} to Depends of all binary packages.
Avoids debhelper-but-no-misc
Since the reporter won't provide a test case, and I believe that the
upload fixed the bug, I'm closing that bug report.
** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as
ruby1.9.1
Hi,
I've just uploaded a new version of the package: 1.9.1.243-1ubuntu1
Could you check that it fixes this bug?
Thank you
--
ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as
ruby1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815
You received this bug notification because
-Depends. We don't build any
arch-specific package anyway, so splitting Build-Depends-Indep and
Build-Depends in pointless.
* Add misc:Depends to Depends so lintian is happier.
-- Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:19:28
+0200
** Affects: feed2imap (Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Please sync libfeedparser-ruby 0.7-1 (universe) from Debian unstable
(main)
This is a dependency for feed2imap 0.9.4-1.
Changelog since current karmic version 0.6-1:
libfeedparser-ruby (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Lucas Nussbaum ]
* New upstream release
that problem?
FYI, I just filed http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1974 about that
issue.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix
Could you provide simple recipes to reproduce the problems you are
seeing, so I can test that my fix actually fixes your problems?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
ruby 1.9.1 should
was not what we wanted.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as
ruby1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815
You
So a better solution would be to hack up rbconfig.rb to point to
/usr/bin/ruby1.9.1, right?
--
ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as
ruby1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
for security updates, etc).
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
[needs-packaging] Ruby 1.9.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330268
You received this bug notification because you
to finish the work on ruby-support in
Debian. I don't have time now, I might have during Debconf (end of
july), but then it might be a bit late for Karmic.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F
libraries. Currently, most libs only support
ruby1.8. Manually upgrading all the libs is a lot of work, so we only
want to do it once, and not for every ruby release.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D
to try to manage all of the
packages out there. In fact I'd rather go without - especially if it's
slowing the release of the main ruby package.
why don't you just compile ruby from source then?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu
to do an apt-get update ruby1.9 and get some fresher bits, thats
all. 1.9.0 is old and it seems straightforward to refresh that package
with 1.9.1.
And how would you deal with installing apps? especially the ones that
are compiled?
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas
against merging/syncing that
package in Ubuntu as long as ruby-support is not ready, and migration
plans have not been decided in Debian.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
[needs
On 18/05/09 at 13:02 -, Niels Ganser wrote:
With the recent release of the new version that donpdonp has pointed
out, they are already lacking behind though.. :)
ah ah.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr
no, sorry, that's how ruby libs are named.
** Changed in: ruby-taglib (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
ruby-taglib not present is repositories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296649
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
Hi,
submittodebian should really follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Debian/Usertagging , so that bugs filed
this way are trackable.
The problem is that reportbug doesn't support adding pseudo-headers. It
seems that the easiest
Ok, I went the non-intrusive path, and added pseudoheaders support to
reportbug. See Debian bug #445144. I think that it would be a good idea
to apply that patch in Ubuntu, then to modify submittodebian to add the
tags, and to make it depend on the new reportbug.
What do you think ?
--
Here is a patch for submittodebian. I haven't tested it, since an
updated reportbug is needed first. But you get the idea. I've set the
release to hardy: it's better than having to remember to set it to
hardy later :P
** Attachment added: usertagging.diff
The current version in edgy fixes this.
** Changed in: tipa (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
updmap run as root
https://launchpad.net/bugs/31724
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
** Changed in: unicode (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
unicode: merge new debian version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/6519
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
** Changed in: zope-ttwtype (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
--
zope-ttwtype: merge new debian version
https://launchpad.net/bugs/5026
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/1553
Task: ubuntu docdiff
Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released
Comment:
This seems to be fixed in Dapper.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3259
Task: ubuntu alexandria
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Public bug report changed:
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/6102
Comment:
I have verified that, looking at the diffs, debian version 1.0-1 can be synced,
overriding all ubuntu changes.
I also confirm that 1.0-1 builds correctly on Ubuntu dapper x86.
Reassigning to motureviewers.
--
52 matches
Mail list logo
