Re: [Bug 401039] Re: Add support for TouchPack family touchscreens (Clevo TN120 series tablets / ASUS eeeTOP and other devices)

2009-11-16 Thread Noah Lively
Mirsal, Please find the output attached. Noah On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Noah Lively noahliv...@gmail.com wrote: Mirsal, I will get this to you first thing in the morning. My touch screen computer is in my office. I am in California and it is 9PM currently. I should be able

Re: [Bug 401039] Re: Add support for TouchPack family touchscreens (Clevo TN120 series tablets / ASUS eeeTOP and other devices)

2009-11-15 Thread Noah Lively
this driver. If there is anything I can do to help you (other than sending the output), please let me know. Thanks, Noah Lively On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Mirsal ENNAIME mirsal.enna...@gmail.comwrote: Actually I'l need the full output of lshal, you should have a device which 'info.udi

[Bug 401039] Re: Add support for TouchPack family touchscreens (Clevo TN120 series tablets / ASUS eeeTOP and other devices)

2009-11-14 Thread Noah Lively
My computer recognizes clicks on the touch screen, but no mouse movement. Also when I run the calibrate program I get a message saying that I don't have a compatible device. I have an Asus Eee Top ET1602. Here's the relevant output from `lshal`: udi =

[Bug 155852] Re: Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection

2009-10-23 Thread Noah
I just ran into this problem with Ubuntu 9.04 2.6.28-15-generic. -- Installation of the package breaks automatic version detection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155852 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 403394] [NEW] Forward-rolling change in btrfs in 2.6.31-rc requires btrfs-tools 0.19

2009-07-23 Thread noah
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: btrfs-tools In recent 2.6.31-rc kernels there is a forward-rolling disk format change that requires version 0.19 of the btrfs-tools. The version of btrfs-tools currently synced from Debian is 0.18-4. See here for more information:

[Bug 217792] Re: MIT-Scheme will not launch

2009-03-31 Thread Noah Lavine
The proposed package starts fine for me, and works in minimal testing. -- MIT-Scheme will not launch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217792 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 303535] [NEW] mit scheme won't start

2008-11-29 Thread Noah Lavine
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 217792 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217792 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mit-scheme I am usuing Ubuntu 8.10, with mit-scheme 7.7.90+20070205-1ubuntu1. When I type scheme in a terminal, I get this error message Largest address does not

[Bug 303535] Re: mit scheme won't start

2008-11-29 Thread Noah Lavine
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 217792 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217792 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 217792 MIT-Scheme will not launch -- mit scheme won't start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303535 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 179284] Re: Incorrect automatic configuration of mono-server2-hosts.conf

2008-11-13 Thread Noah Massey
from the link referenced: -Updates offers patches for serious bugs in Ubuntu packaging that do not affect the security of the system. It seems to me that having XSP fail to start on the LTS server release represent[s] a severe deviance from expected behavior, and that the one line change