[Bug 227183] Re: no calibration tool

2010-01-29 Thread Peter Antoniac
DMA02, regarding your post #44, please make it as a question. I can suggest then that you could run a cut /dev/ttySx and see what is the output when you touch the panel. -- no calibration tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2010-01-25 Thread Peter Antoniac
Done that... It is now in debian work... They where very happy about it... Cheers, Peter -- mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU, which is subscribed to

[Bug 383499] Re: Upgrade kflickr-kde4

2010-01-14 Thread Peter Antoniac
I don't know. Waiting for the inclusion or uploading... ** Changed in: kflickr (Ubuntu) Milestone: None = lucid-alpha-2 -- Upgrade kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 227183] Re: no calibration tool

2010-01-02 Thread Peter Antoniac
That rotation issue is an old problem. Did you try to use the calibration results with the ubuntu driver after? -- no calibration tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 439906] Re: Push to debian the ubuntu-dev-tools that are relevant for them

2009-11-15 Thread Peter Antoniac
As the Debian people are progressing, I have updated the status... ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- Push to debian the ubuntu-dev-tools that are relevant for them https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439906 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 134401] Re: [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device

2009-10-30 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: regression-potential -- [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 134401] Re: [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device

2009-10-28 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 134401] Re: [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device

2009-10-26 Thread Peter Antoniac
Checked the jaunty on the karmic. It has some big issues with the new XINPUT... Hard to debug for me now, but I will spend some times in the future trying to figure out what goes wrong. I even added the void driver and still has issues... -- [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet

[Bug 134401] Re: [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device

2009-10-26 Thread Peter Antoniac
Ok, I had to remove the xserver-xorg-input-evtouch to make it work better... The package should have a conflict with that driver otherwise it hangs the xinput in quite a strange way... -- [needs-packaging] add support for fujitsu tablet input device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134401 You

[Bug 439906] [NEW] Push to debian the ubuntu-dev-tools that are relevant for them

2009-10-01 Thread Peter Antoniac
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools This comes from the Debian interest expressed in Debian bug (debbugs #543315) where they suggested that they could use the ubuntu-dev-tools scripts into the debian sbuild packages. It is also related to the work and comments that are

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-09-22 Thread Peter Antoniac
Thanks Terry. What about that debian comments on inclusion? I am referring to If you file a bug against ubuntu-dev-tools in Ubuntu, you could suggest that they might want to push their changes back to us.. Do we need to do any special action here? Thanks... -- mk-sbuild-lv does not export

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
Added to upstream. I confirm that it was quite bad if you are forced to use proxy and the sdebuild will not debootstrap your system because of the proxy. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #543315 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543315 ** Also affects: sbuild (Debian) via

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
Thanks also for the patch! This should speed up the integration into upstreap/downstream... ** Tags added: packaging ** Tags added: verification-done -- mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416438 You received this bug notification

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
This bug is not in sbuild but in ubuntu-dev-tools. Pointed out by the debian maintainers of sbuild. ** Also affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbuild (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Undecided ** Changed in: sbuild (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
The debian maintainers of sbuild could integrate this tool in their sbuild-createchroot scripts. So, please keep this in mind and try to push this back to debian (if the maintainers of this script could push it to us for proper integration with sbuild was the debian recommendation) --

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
Please see also the comments from the debian bug and how to forward the changes back to them in sbuild-createchroot script... -- mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416438 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 416438] Re: mk-sbuild-lv does not export http_proxy to schroot environment

2009-08-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
I raised the importance level to low as it seems to completely fail if you have a proxy. The whole sbuild environment fails to debootstrap without the patch... ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist = Low ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Milestone: None =

[Bug 383499] Re: Upgrade kflickr-kde4

2009-08-06 Thread Peter Antoniac
So, TundraMan and Jonathan Riddell, what do we do with this bug? If you include it in the Archive, can we then close it? Thanks... Peter -- Upgrade kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 388366] Re: Rake package needs updating

2009-06-17 Thread Peter Antoniac
Hi, and thank you for your report. However, there is a newer version of rake in karmik: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/rake Did you try to install this one? Does it fix the error? ** Tags added: upgrade ** Changed in: rake (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Rake package needs

[Bug 388366] Re: Rake package needs updating

2009-06-17 Thread Peter Antoniac
This bug report is being closed due to your last comment regarding this being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more

[Bug 380031] Re: Please upgrade luma to 2.4

2009-06-16 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Description changed: Binary package hint: luma - On luma.sourceforge.net versie 2.4 is available since february 2008. - Ubuntu still has 2.3.1. Please package 2.4 for ubuntu. Thanks. + On luma.sourceforge.net version 2.4 is available since february 2008. + Ubuntu still has 2.3.1. Please

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-15 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: upgrade -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Branch linked: lp:~pan1nx/+junk/kflickr -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Antoniac
New packages available in: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pan1nx/+archive/ppa/ New debdiff can be seen also there: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pan1nx/+archive/ppa/+files/kflickr_0.9.1-2_20081222-0ubuntu1~ppa1.diff.gz -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Changed in: kflickr (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: kflickr (Ubuntu) Assignee: Peter Antoniac (pan1nx) = (unassigned) -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Antoniac
I have created it the ready for archives (changed version) in another PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pan1nx/+archive/motu (debdiff is also there agains Ubuntu version) -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-12 Thread Peter Antoniac
New debdiff here: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pan1nx/+archive/motu/+files/kflickr_0.9.1-2_0.9.1+20081222-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Antoniac
I'll start to work in this... ** Changed in: kflickr (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: kflickr (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Peter Antoniac (pan1nx) -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Antoniac
Found: https://edge.launchpad.net/~asselsm/+archive/ppa as being build...Investigating further... -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Antoniac
I am awaiting some comments from MOTU list. If I get them to answer, don't worry, I will build it for karmic and jaunty... -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Antoniac
Check out my PPA: https://edge.launchpad.net/~pan1nx/+archive/ppa I build it for karmic. Let me know if you really want it for jaunty, I can then copy it there... More later... -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 383499] Re: [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4

2009-06-08 Thread Peter Antoniac
Sure, I'll follow those steps... I just didn't have time to update/checkout those things as I concentrated in making a fast karmic build... -- [needs-packaging] kflickr-kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 227183] Re: no calibration tool

2009-05-31 Thread Peter Antoniac
Hmm, I guess based on comment 40 we should go back to work again over this issues. Where did you get the driver from? Was it packaged by Ubuntu? ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-penmount (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-penmount (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 365998] Re: Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list...

2009-05-04 Thread Peter Antoniac
) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Peter Antoniac (pan1nx) -- Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365998 You received

[Bug 365998] Re: Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list...

2009-04-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
Is this related to debootstrap that doesn't get the right parameter passed from the config file? -- Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365998 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 365998] Re: Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list...

2009-04-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
I see that it doesn't...Marked it as confirmed until someone is taking a closer look... ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Changing the repository sources location for mk-sbuild-lv fails: still using the old/default sources.list...

[Bug 259277] Re: flash pages not available with plugins installed

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Antoniac
I think this is a bug for flashplugin-nonfree rather than mythbrowser... ** Package changed: mythbrowser (Ubuntu) = flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) ** Tags added: likely-dup regression -- flash pages not available with plugins installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259277 You received this bug

[Bug 354178] Re: Konqueror and flash Kubuntu 9.04 AMD64

2009-04-06 Thread Peter Antoniac
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately we can't fix it without more information. Can you please tell us if the Firefox is capable to play flash videos? Can you check it with several web providers, like goodevideo, youtube? Thank you

[Bug 353120] Re: Please make firefox-3.1 Provide: firefox

2009-04-02 Thread Peter Antoniac
Marked won-t fix as it will be done in 3.5 ** Changed in: firefox-3.1 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Won't Fix -- Please make firefox-3.1 Provide: firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353120 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 316423] Re: [i830] black screen after intrepid login intel graphics

2009-03-27 Thread Peter Antoniac
So, we can conclude that it is a problem with compiz? Tormod Volden can check it deeper I will mark it also likely-dup as I have a feeling I have seen something similar... ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- [i830] black screen after

[Bug 316423] Re: [i830] black screen after intrepid login intel graphics

2009-03-24 Thread Peter Antoniac
We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested information? Thanks! -- [i830] black screen after intrepid login intel graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316423 You received this bug notification

[Bug 312567] Re: Directorey include/ is missing

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: bitesize packaging -- Directorey include/ is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312567 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 341852] Re: vmware-console causes Xorg 99% CPU and freeze system

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Antoniac
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at

[Bug 342294] Re: package ubuntustudio-audio 0.44 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-03-13 Thread Peter Antoniac
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 342292 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342292 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #342292, so it is being marked as such. Please look

[Bug 335478] Re: hildon-desktop fails to trap crashes in embedded applications

2009-02-27 Thread Peter Antoniac
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. To be able to check further, could you please include in this bug report: * The version of Ubuntu that you are running * The version of the package (hildon-desktop) * The actions taken to reproduce the problem

[Bug 322001] Re: Intrepid netboot hangs on Acer Aspire One

2009-01-28 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Changed in: unetbootin (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = unetbootin ** Tags added: hw-specific -- Intrepid netboot hangs on Acer Aspire One https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322001 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 321863] Re: Name of JDK documentation zip has changed

2009-01-27 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: packaging ** Tags added: bitesize -- Name of JDK documentation zip has changed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 321889] Re: please update to solr 1.3

2009-01-27 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: upgrade -- please update to solr 1.3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 318849] Re: Installation of klash revealed that the package was not build properly (doesn't contain any binaries)

2009-01-19 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Changed in: gnash (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Installation of klash revealed that the package was not build properly (doesn't contain any binaries) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318849 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 317822] Re: tellico always want to save the collection

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Antoniac
I tried to reproduce the bug without success. I even created a new Book collection just to make sure... I am using 1.3.2. Can you please do this test: 1. copy the file before opening it in tellico 2. open tellico, browse only, and close (so you need to save as you said) 3. then run a diff -Naur

[Bug 317827] Re: install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: packaging -- install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 317827] Re: install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Antoniac
I guess this problem can be solved with a right package dependency, if confirmed? -- install script crashes on unknown ld option -Bsylmbolic-functions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317827 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 317843] Re: Runs as root by default

2009-01-16 Thread Peter Antoniac
** Tags added: feature-request packaging -- Runs as root by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 312567] [NEW] Directorey include/ is missing

2008-12-30 Thread Peter Antoniac
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: flatnuke The package doesn't contain the include directory and hence it doesn't work. ** Affects: flatnuke (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Directorey include/ is missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312567 You received

[Bug 227183] Re: no calibration tool

2008-12-15 Thread Peter Antoniac
We close it for now. It seems that there are many fixes in the intrepid and jaunty. Feel free to reopen if it still causes problems. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-penmount (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- no calibration tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227183 You

[Bug 227183] Re: no calibration tool

2008-12-01 Thread Peter Antoniac
Are there any updates on this? Does it work? Can we close this? -- no calibration tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227183 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]