Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
We're in the process of disabling the edge service root.
The following tools seem to still try to use edge:
manage-credentials
(just doing a grep for '\edge\' should find any other cases.)
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Robert Collins (lifeless)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
I'd love to have this available in e.g. lptools which is a bit more
upstream focused; I'm happy to migrate the code over, but lptools is
GPL3 :- does that cause any sort of issue? [both are (C) Canonical, so I
wouldn't expect an issue].
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: quickly-widgets
quickly widgets is a python package, thus following the python package
guidelines it should be called 'python-quickly.widgets', not 'quickly-
widgets'
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Feb 5 05:16:37 2010
DistroRelease:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38711229/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38711230/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38711231/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
review-notifier crashed with gaierror in connect()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: gwibber (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ken VanDine (ken-vandine)
--
gwibber fails if there isn't a genchant spell dict for the locale
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/439146
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Public bug reported:
Please sync subunit 0.0.4-4 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
Changelog entries since current lucid version 0.0.2-1:
subunit (0.0.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Upstream bugfix for FTBFS on test_child.c.
-- Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net Sun, 20 Dec 2009
:
python-testtools (0.9.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
-- Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net Sun, 22 Nov 2009
14:31:14 +1100
python-testtools (0.1~r16-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Add to Debian. Closes: #547479
* Change Maintainer to me.
-- Robert Collins robe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 410407 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 410407
[READ DESCRIPTION] Flash is not recognizing mouse clicks in multiple
situations
--
Karmic RC mouse clicks in flash player do not work
How would downgrading to a lower version help if private trackers are
banning =1.75
--
Transmission Version 1.76 is Available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460620
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 21:33 +, Albert Damen wrote:
The screenshot looks like the screenshot in
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24315 comment 2.
Robert, if you can confirm the upstream screenshots match what you are
seeing, it may be worth to add a tracker.
That looks just
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
For the last week or two I've been getting occasional screen corruption;
I don't use compiz, and its occurring in terminals [it may happen in
browsers etc, but I use a terminal most of the time ;P]. Generally I'll
have just paged
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915459/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915460/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915461/Dependencies.txt
**
** Attachment added: screen tearing
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33915526/corruption.png
--
graphics corruption occuring with normal use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454984
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 20:59 +, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
There have been a number of new releases of the xserver-xorg-video-intel
package since this bug was raised, but I'm still seeing sluggish
performance and screen corruption when the machine comes out of s2disk.
We're advised to file
I'm seeing similar; I noticed it while on the plane from Montreal, but
its still affecting me with power in the house ... upgraded on thursday
and before that it was a-ok.
--
Sluggish performance on Intel video card
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421232
You received this bug notification
PPA packaging changes.
-- Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net Sun, 20 Sep 2009
12:09:00 +1000
subunit (0.0.2-0ubuntu2) unstable; urgency=low
* Set INSTALLDIRS=vendor and install perl modules.
-- Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net Sun, 20 Sep 2009
09:38:52 +1000
subunit (0.0.2
I'll note that pre-release snapshots are in Ubuntu at the moment, the
code delta in 'new upstream release' is actually very small ;).
--
Sync subunit 0.0.2-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/440976
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 14:48 +, Chris wrote:
Due to incompatibility with libplexus Maven2 is unusable in Karmic. The
package NEEDS to be pulled from Debian testing. Even if there are bugs
in their package, they cannot be as big as the program being totally
unusable. The importance should
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32736516/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32736517/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32736518/ProcStatus.txt
** Attachment
** Package changed: ubuntu = config-manager (Ubuntu)
--
FFe: Sync config-manager 0.4-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Package changed: ubuntu = libgetopt++ (Ubuntu)
--
FFe: Sync libgetopt++ 0.0.2-p22-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434927
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
I did $ requestsync --lp -e config-manager
this made a bug filed on 'ubuntu'. Config-manager isn't in karmic, but
it was in hardy, so the package exists and can have a bug filed on it.
It would be nicer if requestsync were to do this ;)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32292535/Dependencies.txt
--
requestsync of removed reinstated package uses 'ubuntu' rather than the
package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434984
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which
-0ubuntu2:
testresources (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Incorporate Ubuntu uploads and Debian NMU's.
* Convert CDBS patch to merge from trunk.
-- Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net Sun, 20 Sep 2009
17:19:22 +1000
** Affects: testresources (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Siegfried Gevatter wrote:
I don't undestand what you mean. What's an upstream product?
Its a product hosted on Launchpad, as opposed to a source package in
Ubuntu. Many [ideally all] Ubuntu packages have them, configured with
the appropriate data
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
e.g. visit https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-tools/+filebug.
Either there shouldn't be an upstream product, or it should accept bugs.
** Affects: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32126539/Dependencies.txt
--
requestsync -e package errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433715
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is subscribed to ubuntu-dev-tools in ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-dev-tools
g$ requestsync -e subunit
E: Source package or target release missing. Exiting.
the docs say the distro is optional. With --lp it *is* optional.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Sep 21 09:26:24 2009
DistroRelease:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31951013/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31951014/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31951015/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Null-References-The-Billion-Dollar-
Mistake-Tony-Hoare caused npviewer to die.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
AssertionMessage: npviewer.bin:
Wasn't a bug, was user error.
** Changed in: maven2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
Maven throws exception since upgrade to Intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Rather than typing in +1 vote, please use the 'affects me too' button in
launchpad - it keeps bugs clearer for reading :).
Anyhow, this is packaged in Debian/sid now, but upstream have released
2.2.1 saying there are critical http issues in 2.2.0 - I think we should
wait for 2.2.1 to be packaged;
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: maven2
This is separate to the 2.2.0 bug because that bug is fixed in its
upstream link, and we can't link to multiple tasks upstream as far as I
know.
** Affects: maven2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Triaged
** Affects: maven2
Maven 2.2.1 aims to correct several critical regressions related to the
selection of the HttpClient-based Wagon implementation for HTTP/HTTPS
transfers in Maven 2.2.0.
** Changed in: maven2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: maven2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Public bug reported:
affects ubuntu/mnemosyne
done
in mnemosyne.core's initialise function:
lockfile = file(join(basedir,MNEMOSYNE_LOCK),'w')
This doesn't actually do a mutex lock, so its possible for two copies of
mnemosyne (or other things using the library) to bypass the protection
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grisbi
The help options in grisbi invoke 'mozilla' rather than 'www-browser'
which will work on Debian/ubuntu systems, or (perhaps better) looking up
the right application in the gnome desktop preferences. This may be the
same bug as 161055; however
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28721017/Dependencies.txt
--
quickstart tries to run mozilla, not www-browser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grisbi
Setting up currencies currently requires three steps:
prefs - currencies - create them
exit the prefs window
prefs - totals currencies - use the currency that was setup before
setting the currency up should make it available in the totals section
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28721076/Dependencies.txt
--
currencies are not immediately usable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395927
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: homebank
I have epiphany set as my browser in preferred applications. But
firefox is run instead.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Jul 6 11:26:59 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Package: homebank 4.0.3-1
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28722240/Dependencies.txt
--
help-contents runs firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395946
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
Just for clarity.. www-browser may not be best, gnome-www-browser, or
another may be better.
--
quickstart tries to run mozilla, not www-browser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 02:01 +, Andrew Bennetts wrote:
I think this is a bzr-svn problem, so reassigning accordingly.
It can be achieved using bzr merge.
-Rob
--
Rev IDs are negative
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385684
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hi David, your drive setup isn't suffering from the HPA offset issue.
Please file a new bug so that your problem can be tracked - the HPA bug
will be closed soon and I wouldn't want to prevent your issue getting
examined.
--
host protected area prevents detection of isw (intel matrix storage
** Attachment added: boot dmraid.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27319090/dmraid.log
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
I'm attaching a new debdiff that adds a slight tweak to dmraid-activate
to output the command line params.
It shows, pretty clearly, that dmraid-activate is being called with
'no'
'block'
'devices'
'found'
I'm really not sure where to go from here :(
** Attachment added: 7ubuntu1-7ubuntu2
** Attachment added: dmraid-activate.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27319106/dmraid-activate.log
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This isn't fully fixed, as dmraid-activate still greps for errors.
Raid_Name=$(dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/$Node_Name)
if [ $? ]; then
exit 0
fi
in dmraid-activate corrects it; I'm including this in my future debdiffs
for bug 376792, as a grep mismatch was affecting things.
--
having to grep
Uhm if [ 0 != $? ]; then ... obviously, ust having a thunko day :).
--
having to grep for no raid disks is a poor approach
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300825
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
This is cleaned up; it removes noise due to dmraid-activate not handling
dmraid errors properly when probing for raid names.
dmraid.log when configured to log on boot shows:
dmraid-activate run with no
dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/no
no block devices found
dmraid-activate run with block
dmraid -i -r -cr
Normal practice is to have
[person]
details
[person]
details
within each changelog entry, and to have the overall entry attributed to
the last person that touched it/did the upload.
In Ubuntu the uploaders field is unimportant; its relevant for debian
because its an explicit out for the
A month with no feedback - closing. Looks like a sax transition. or
perhaps being run during an apt-upgrade to me. Andrew, if this is still
happening to you please do reopen this bug report, and we'll try to get
to the root of the problem.
** Changed in: mnemosyne (Ubuntu)
Status:
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 08:18 +, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Robert Collins ha scritto:
A bug can be confirmed without having enough information for a developer
to fix it; and as its assigned to me it does in fact have a dev working
I'm not expert with ubuntu bugs status, but in your wiki
I tried -7 with my hpa patch applied, still fails to boot au naturale
:). So it looks like not a dupe to me, or my HPA patch interferes with
the fix.
I've modified dmraid-activate to allow debugging if invoked with
DMRAID_DEBUG=1, using your debug code, patch for both attached. I'll
attach log
** Attachment added: log from running with /dev/sda
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26807882/dmraid.log.dev-sda.gz
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: log from running with sda
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26807895/dmraid.log.gz
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: activate log from running with /dev/sda
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26807905/dmraid-activate.log.dev-sda.gz
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Attachment added: activate log from running with sda
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26807921/dmraid-activate.log.gz
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Attachment added: activate log from udev invoking dmraid-activate
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26808229/dmraid-activate.log.boot.gz
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
So, these two logs are from udev running dmraid-activate, as opposed to
me running it by hand. This confirms that udev is running dmraid-
activate.
** Attachment added: dmraid log from udev running dmraid-activate
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26808272/dmraid.log.boot.gz
--
dmraid not
(Sorry for all the spam :P). Anyway, as I read the log, udev is invoking
dmraid-activate 4 times:
/sbin/dmraid-activate no
/sbin/dmraid-activate block
/sbin/dmraid-activate devices
/sbin/dmraid-activate found
(I base this by looking at grep -- --degraded boot/dmraid-activate.log,
which is the
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 11:11 +, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Robert Collins ha scritto:
So, these two logs are from udev running dmraid-activate, as opposed to
me running it by hand. This confirms that udev is running dmraid-
activate.
ERROR: either the required RAID set not found
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dmraid
Data I need to gather -
dmraid_activate -x log
and or
why dmraid_activate isn't running.
** Affects: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Robert Collins (lifeless)
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu
edit d-a, log to /dev/.initramfs/foo, set -x
--
dmraid not activating on boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
I appreciate it looks like a dup, but perhaps you could let me finish
investigating before marking as the duplicate of a fix-released bug.
If it is the same, sure, we'll collapse them - and we'll need to open a
bug task on jaunty, because if its a common issue jaunty is rather
broken ;)
** This
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 15:26 +, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Robert Collins ha scritto:
I appreciate it looks like a dup, but perhaps you could let me finish
investigating before marking as the duplicate of a fix-released bug.
Good point, but perhaps you shouldn't mark as confirmed a bug
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 15:49 +, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
Robert Collins ha scritto:
edit d-a, log to /dev/.initramfs/foo, set -x
In case you need some debug logs, the tar.gz in attachment could help:
Thanks!
-Rob
--
dmraid not activating on boot
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 07:59 +, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins ha scritto:
So, I may have been writing an hpa interpreter.
Could you try with my patch, with and without 'libata.ignore_hpa=0' ?
For the HPA issue, Tejun Heo wrote[1] a patch but upstream never
This tweak to the patch bounds-checks what we got, so we don't try to
read before the start of the disk.
** Attachment added: 20080512-bounds-checked
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26629442/17_fix_isw_raid_detection_1TB.patch
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
** Summary changed:
- intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
+ host protected area prevents detection of isw (intel matrix storage manager)
raid arrays
** Also affects: dmraid (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
host protected area prevents detection of isw (intel
This updated patch is ready for testing; it uses the gafr string as a
signature, no build warnings added, finds my metadata using that on both
drives.
Of course, it could be coincidence, but then finding some users with the
same issue will be needed. I'm going to post to ubuntu-devel once I
build
Hmm, I still need to bounds-cap the read call. I'll do that tomorrow, I
think its unlikely to cause issues in practice but safe sorry.
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 20:25 +, 3b wrote:
This is actually the metadata being moved to a different location so
dmraid cant find it.
with 2113 fewer total blocks on /dev/sda, and dmraid finds the metadata
on both disks.
So, I may have been writing an hpa interpreter.
Could you try with
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 23:10 +, 3b wrote:
Sure, if i can figure out how to build it :)
apt-get source dmraid
apt-get build-dep dmraid
wget
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26558415/17_fix_isw_raid_detection_1TB.patch
cd dmraid-1.0.0.rc15 (I think, you may have a slightly different name)
export
quilt fail :(. This has the isw.h changes needed.
** Attachment removed: patch to detect on my hardware
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26492397/17_fix_isw_raid_detection_1TB.patch
** Attachment removed: Fully data driven patch, with fallback to hard code as
insurance.
** Attachment added: v3 dsc
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26610037/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.dsc
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: v3 diff.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26610038/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.diff.gz
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 00:41 +, Luke Yelavich wrote:
Tested dmraid from karmic with Robert's patch included on my ICH9
controller, and everything works fine.
My server has ICH10, since it was built last year, and likely has HPA
stuff I could enable, however I am not about to take it
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 00:58 +, 3b wrote:
seems to work:
...
Cool, thanks.
I think this validates the hpa theory, and we should rename the patch
accordingly. Better still would be to lookup the specs on hpa and
create||use a libhpa to adjust di-sectors. But that can wait.
-Rob
--
intel
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 13:13 +, danwood76 wrote:
Sounds good, if someone else with ICH10 can test it would be great.
Write a patch based on your idea and I will test it to verify it still
works with ICH8 also but I obviously cannot test the ICH10.
Thanks, shall do.
-Rob
--
intel isw
I've added some instrumentation and made my printf a log entry. dmraid
-rd now shows:
DEBUG: not isw at 1000204884992
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 1000203803136 from probe at 1000203803136
DEBUG: not isw at 1000204884992
DEBUG: isw metadata found at 1000203803136 from probe at 1000203803136
Is
** Attachment added: debian diff for the 2nd version of patch
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26492490/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.diff.gz
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This is the dd of the last 1K of disk (which is where the pre-existing
isw search code would look). As you can see its mainly NULL's but there
is a suspicious ICH10 late in the piece.
hexdump too:
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ||
*
0200 24 47 41
** Attachment added: dsc for second version (for dpkg-source -x laziness)
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26492494/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.dsc
** Attachment removed: Updated debian package
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26351026/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.diff.gz
--
intel isw raid
2113 in hex is 841, so the 0x4108 at bytes 0x206-0x207 (=518-519) could
be a dereference (-2113 sectors from here) except that it should be 842
as those bytes are in the -1 sector, not the -2.
If so, then this is definitely a new ISW metadata format; I'd have to
guess that the $GAFR is a new
On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 10:57 +, danwood76 wrote:
You could do a probe for the ICH10 tag for now.
That would probably be safer than guessing a dereference, then we need some
more ICH10R based people to test which will take time.
You could try building another RAID set with a couple of
My guess is they have added more data/larger journal space - something
like that, and that older formats will be read by the new controller but
not vice verca. I'll poke around there tomorrow.
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug
** Attachment added: Updated debian package
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26351026/dmraid_1.0.0.rc15-6ubuntu3.diff.gz
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
fdisk output:
$ sudo fdisk -u -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x
(note that the signature is exactly 2115 sectors back from the end
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: dmraid
For some reason, my isw based system has the raid metadata 2115 sectors
back. I've hard coded the offset in which got me working; I'm not sure
what algorithm should be getting used - perhaps its a misdetect between
BIOS and linux, or some other
** Attachment added: first version, just hard codes my sector in, but
demonstrates the shape of the patch.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26351050/current.patch
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are
lspci details
** Attachment added: lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26351090/lspci.txt
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
It output
/dev/sdb: isw, isw_cahfcbgdcf, GROUP, ok, 1953523053 sectors, data@ 0
/dev/sda: isw, isw_cahfcbgdcf, GROUP, ok, 1953523053 sectors, data@ 0
to the console, and the attached subdirectory.
** Attachment added: dmraid -rD output directory.
Just for clarity - with my patch I've successfully installed Ubuntu,
though it wants me to manually dmraid -ay on boot; I'll track that down
later.
--
intel isw raid metadata at odd offset
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801JIR (ICH10R) LPC Interface
Controller
If I read that correctly its a ICH10R. If there is somewhere else I
should look, let me know and I'll go do so.
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Description changed:
- Binary
axiom | 20050901-10.1 | jaunty/universe | source
** Changed in: axiom (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
Please sync axiom 20050901-10 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258719
You received this bug notification because you are a
It's been synced from debian and is still FTBFS; Luca, do you know what
change specifically to gcl causes the FTBFS?
--
FTBFS: axiom_20050901-9ubuntu1 on hardy/i386
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163603
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This may be related to bug 163603 which is apparently caused by a change
to gcl.
--
axiom reports System error: Couldn't protect to almost all commands
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295117
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
