I find myself doing easy_install pip instead to get a more recent
version, quite silly as it's easy_install one wants to avoid. Not sure
if it could potentially cause conflicts too if some Ubuntu package
depends on python-pip. So +1 from me.
--
Package update request: python-pip
https://bugs.laun
** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU (motu)
--
Package update request: python-pip
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521170
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a bug assignee.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@li
** Changed in: python-virtualenv (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => MOTU (motu)
--
Upgrade to virtualenv 1.4.5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/485944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of MOTU,
which is a bug assignee.
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@li
damnit! find 2.5 -> 2.6... hehe sorry.
--
pump points to /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/include_server/include_server.py
although it is installed in
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/include_server/include_server.py
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/472201
You received this bug notification because you
sudo editor /usr/bin/pump
find text "python2.6" and replace with "python2.6"
Works for me.
--
pump points to /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/include_server/include_server.py
although it is installed in
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/include_server/include_server.py
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4
SORRY! I posted too quickly, the last workaround is a bit too dirty.
launchpad admins, feel free to remove this comment and my previous.
--
pump points to /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/include_server/include_server.py
although it is installed in
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/include_server/includ
a workaround which seems to work is:
sudo ln -s /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6 /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5
It may cause problems elsewhere, I don't know yet.
--
pump points to /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/include_server/include_server.py
although it is installed in
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Fabrice,
>
> Yes, I'll work with dag on it. As for Fix Committed, please note that I
> was backing it off from Fix Released, since that certainly wasn't the
> case. The fix is (at least) committed upstream. In any event,
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> @dag, OK. The comments in the change log led me to believe that you had
> called it a release. If you'll keep me informed or work with me, I can
> prepare packages. I've already done it for myself based on SVN. How far
> are yo
released yet. I was planning a release but it
has not yet happened.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
Disk total stats are double
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307961
You received this bug notif
And here is a bad, but hopefully better than nothing, photo of the
garbled screen.
** Attachment added: "screen-photo.jpg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29827922/screen-photo.jpg
--
[i915] 'xrandr' with no arguments garbles screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408432
You received this bug n
This is the output of the triggering 'xrandr' command.
** Attachment added: "xrandr.out"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29827533/xrandr.out
--
[i915] 'xrandr' with no arguments garbles screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29827299/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29827300/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29827301/Dependencies.txt
** A
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
This is on a Dell Latitide X1 laptop, and only occurs under the
following circumstances:
1. xorg is started
2. The external monitor (a Dell 2001 FP) is plugged into the VGA port
3. 'xrandr' is called without arguments, and insta
how I could track them in the future. I am
already tracking the individual bug-reports for dstat, but there may be
fixes going into the package that are not related to a bug ? (eg.
packaging changes ?)
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, t
No visible improvement.
xrandr reports the same as before:
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1152 x 864, maximum 1360 x 1360
VGA disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
TMDS-1 connected 1152x864+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x
0mm
1360x768 59.8
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Hi Dag. You're welcome. Glad that I was able to help and give you a
> start on the fix. With respect to the discover functions, are you
> seeing partitions under /sys/block/*? I see only devices, e.g., sda,
> and that is reflected
r in the full list)
- Make sure all devices are being filtered (eg. sdaa1)
I committed the patch to subversion and it will be part of 0.6.10 when it
is released. Thanks a lot for the feedback and patch !
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling,
l see what I mean.
--
-- dag wieers, d...@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
--
Disk total stats are double
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307961
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
t; ** Affects: dstat (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
I cannot help if I don't know what dstat version and what kernel. On my
system I do not see that behaviour, but it is not impossible that this
behaviour exists with older dstat versions and/or older or
20 matches
Mail list logo