This is working fine in Feisty (reboot needed for permissions to take
root), so I'm closing.
** Changed in: fuse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs m
I'm using edgy as well and had the same problem.
Rules existed. I was in fuse group and fuse was the group in /dev/fuse.
Still I got permission denied error.
Anyway, I had just installed ssftp and obligatory packages, so I decided to use
the magical trick;
reboot. Now everything works perfect
// do you have the udev rules file in place ?
// (ls /etc/udev/rules.d/|grep fuse )
The output from that command gets me this:
45-fuse.rules
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-
do you have the udev rules file in place ?
(ls /etc/udev/rules.d/|grep fuse )
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
>> In both cases (Dapper and Edgy) the fuse module got loaded
automatically (I did not perform any modprobe) but Edgy got the wrong
permissions to /dev/fuse (Dapper got it right).
I am also on Edgy, and I experience the exact same issue: the fuse module was
loaded automatically, but even users i
I thought I unsubscribed from this bug. I'm no longer running Ubuntu,
I've gone back to Debian.
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
Have just installed sshfs (which requires fuse-utils) on a Dapper host
and on an Edgy laptop, so I could mount a directory from host to the
laptop through sshfs.
Tried a few times and it didn't work because I needed to add myself to
fuse group, so I did that. Then, tried again and fusermount said
** Bug 31052 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Well, we need fuse-utils to be installed then. It just seems silly to not do
it the same way lsm-realtime does it. Its obviously the best solution, and it
requires less hacking of fusermount.
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/
There might be a good reason: if the module is loaded and fuse-utils
is not installed, udev won't have any rule for the module and will
create /dev/fuse with mode 660 and owner root.root, meaning that the
fuse tools will fail.
Mount at startup might be ok, but after checking for a udev rule
(feels
Oh hey! We _can_ reply by email and have it work! Thats a new one! ... I do
_not_ like this feature whatsoever.
Anyhow, I dont know why the module just isnt loaded at startup using, say, an
init.d script like lsm-realtime does and whatnot.
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded
Hmmm. it seems that replying by e-mail worked, according to what I see here.
But how far can we trust what we see to be reality?
Anyways, I agree that when a user tries to mount a FUSE-based filesystem, the
kernel module should be loaded automatically. Of course, we could force-load it
at star
Oooops sorry! Will post in launchpad.
2006/4/8, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday 08 April 2006 09:49, Hervé Fache wrote:
> > I agree. Sorry if I was not clear.
>
> If you meant to reply on the bug report itself, you can't reply via email. At
> least, not yet.
>
> > 2006/4/7, P
On Saturday 08 April 2006 09:49, Hervé Fache wrote:
> I agree. Sorry if I was not clear.
If you meant to reply on the bug report itself, you can't reply via email. At
least, not yet.
> 2006/4/7, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Launchpad needs the ability to edit or delete comments, da
I agree. Sorry if I was not clear.
2006/4/7, Patrick McFarland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Launchpad needs the ability to edit or delete comments, damnit.
>
> ...
>
> So, are you agreeing or disagreeing that fuse needs more automagic for the
> modules?
> --
> fusermount requires fuse module kernel to
Are you agreeing th
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs mailing list
universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs
Launchpad needs the ability to edit or delete comments, damnit.
...
So, are you agreeing or disagreeing that fuse needs more automagic for the
modules?
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/1860
--
universe-bugs maili
Loading a module is not trivial. Kernel stuff is better done automatically.
** Changed in: fuse (Ubuntu)
Severity: Minor => Normal
Priority: Low => Medium
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
fusermount requires fuse module kernel to be loaded, isn't done automagically
https://lau
18 matches
Mail list logo
