[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-20 Thread beyboo
I had the same problem which I had logged as a bug # 311320. Obviously too many bugs going around in the same category. This fix resolved my bug. -- SRU for cheese 2.24.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is su

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package cheese - 2.24.2-0ubuntu0+intrepid1 --- cheese (2.24.2-0ubuntu0+intrepid1) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low * New upstream release; LP: #309039. - Support for webcam with only one resolution. - Add some debug code. -- Loic MinierTue, 06 J

Re: [Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-13 Thread Andres Mujica
don't worry at all, it seems that one reporter is doing fine the debug so it wouldn't be needed Thanks!! > Sorry, it's too late for this SRU and would require another SRU. I > don't run intrepid anymore and would prefer not having to do any other > libv4l/cheese SRUs. > > I recommend you push

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-13 Thread Loïc Minier
Sorry, it's too late for this SRU and would require another SRU. I don't run intrepid anymore and would prefer not having to do any other libv4l/cheese SRUs. I recommend you push a patched package to your PPA or ask someone to do such an upload, then point users at the patched packages for debugg

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-13 Thread Andres Mujica
Hi Loïc, woud it be possible, IF this doesn't affect the SRU and IF Filippo agree with it, that you include the flash debug code from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=125572&action=view it's for bug #297890 not a really big deal but it would be nice. Thanks again by the way i've te

Re: [Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-09 Thread Filippo Argiolas
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Tormod Volden wrote: > I tried -v and --verbose with no luck. These options are not mentioned > in the man page, but that would be another bug. As far as I remember we don't ship any man page, probably it comes from a debian or ubuntu patch. Anyway, do you mean ch

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-08 Thread Tormod Volden
I tried -v and --verbose with no luck. These options are not mentioned in the man page, but that would be another bug. -- SRU for cheese 2.24.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub

Re: [Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-08 Thread Filippo Argiolas
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tormod Volden wrote: > Tested the version 2.24.2-0ubuntu0+intrepid1 (with my Genius Eye) and > everything worked fine, no regressions AFAICS. I can not comment on any > bug fixes though. Where is that debug information supposed to show up? It should come up runnin

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-08 Thread Tormod Volden
Tested the version 2.24.2-0ubuntu0+intrepid1 (with my Genius Eye) and everything worked fine, no regressions AFAICS. I can not comment on any bug fixes though. Where is that debug information supposed to show up? -- SRU for cheese 2.24.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309039 You received this bu

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-08 Thread Loïc Minier
Tested with an effect, took a couple of pictures and a video, tested full screen, checked version in about. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- SRU for cheese 2.24.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309039 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-08 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted into intrepid-proposed, please test and give feedback here. Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Changed in: cheese (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => F

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-06 Thread Loïc Minier
Uploaded 2.24.2-0ubuntu0+intrepid1 to intrepid-proposed for your review and validation. No packaging change, except for an awful version number; 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 is already used in jaunty and appending a ~ would have suggested this is a backport of 2.24.2-0ubuntu1 (and it's not). cheese (2.24.2-0u

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-04 Thread Martin Pitt
Thanks for the detailled explanations. If we can get some people to test the package in -proposed thoroughly, I'm okay with that, especially if it will help you so much with debugging other problems. So Loic, please go ahead and upload. > By the way, I thought GNOME 2.24.x series had some kind of

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-04 Thread Filippo Argiolas
Hi Martin, I'm a Cheese developer. I think the "important" bug Loic did talk about was the one about webcams supporting just one resolution not working properly. The other modifications are just minor leak fixes. I explicitly asked Loic to open this SRU for the improved debug information about

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2009-01-04 Thread Martin Pitt
What is that important bug, the memory leak? The version introduces quite a lot of new code which isn't really important for a stable release, and at this stage, getting proper verification results from intrepid users is hard. Do we have a corresponding Launchpad bug for this "important bug"? If s

[Bug 309039] Re: SRU for cheese 2.24.2

2008-12-17 Thread Loïc Minier
** Attachment added: "diff between cheese 2.24.1 and 2.24.2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20503705/cheese-2.24.2.diff -- SRU for cheese 2.24.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/309039 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --