** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic/libpst
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b..
Ouch, that's really bad luck, it was one of the (few) good selling
points for Gnome 2.26... I really hope it will be in an update.
Thanks for your hard work to make Ubuntu as good as it is.
Vincent
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 19:11, C de-Avillez wrote:
> Hi Vincent.
>
> Yes, libpst is not installed
Hi Vincent.
Yes, libpst is not installed by default on Jaunty. It ended up that
Evolution did not get the PST-import plugin enabled for Jaunty: we did
not have enough time to get it in; it might get in on either an update
for Jaunty, or on Karmic (Jaunty+1).
Although you can manually select and i
Hi,
libpst - 0.6.27-0ubuntu1 package is not installed by default (on a fresh
install) in Jaunty RC (I guess that's where the optional comes in play...).
Shouldn't it be there by default to help new users migration? I haven't found
Ubuntu related documentation stating one should install this pack
s/extra/optional/ - braino in the changelog ;)
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
This bug was fixed in the package libpst - 0.6.27-0ubuntu1
---
libpst (0.6.27-0ubuntu1) jaunty; urgency=low
[ HggdH ]
* new upstream source being used (LP: #317602) -- www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst:
Debian's libpst version does not provide a shared library, and
does not supp
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Iain Lane (laney)
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification be
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
debdiff for Evolution 2.26.0 to activate pst-import is attached.
** Attachment added: "debdiff Evo 2.26.0-0ubuntu2 and (proposed) 0ubuntu3"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24364326/evo-pst-importer.debdiff
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchp
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu)
Assignee: C de-Avillez (hggdh2) => (unassigned)
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Changed in: libpst (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
libpst-0.6.27-1 has been uploaded to REVU.
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b.
Done (but still using autotools: I wanted to be sure that anyone could
get the source and build it outside of Ubuntu).
I guess, now, I should adjust the cahngelog and submit it to Revu,
Correct?
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
the packaging looks mostly fine to me, the rules is a rather complicated
and running autootols at build is not optimal but that should work,
otherwise there is makefiles to clean in the debian directory
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
thanks. Changes done, submitted 1ppa6; chatted with Sébastien, and he
will have a go at it after I get a successful build.
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Good work.
Here's a few changes I'd do:
- use {shlibs:Depends} instead of explicit library dependencies, add
{misc:Depends} too
- rename libpst to libpst1
- remove a few (with cdbs) unneccesary files
- small fixes here and there.
Please ask Séb to give it another spin. I'm sure he'll find so
ah well. Got hit by a wrong expectation that libtool would be
automatically included by CDBS (like automake and autoconf). Anyway, the
correct version is 0.6.27-1ppa5 now.
Also, the diff for the package is quite small, so I guess I am on the
right track.
** Changed in: libpst (Ubuntu)
Assign
Daniel, I think this time I got it right. Can you please check the
package in my PPA (libpst-0.6.27-1ppa4 and friends)?
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I don't think it's wrong to pick the fork if that makes more sense, but
I'd try to ensure that the packaging is similar to what it was before,
it'll also help with getting the Debian bug fixed. :-)
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
No, you did not look at the wrong package. As I said, the source
upstream tarball comes pre-debianised in a basic, incomplete, and wrong,
way. All the sample *.ex and *.EX are added this way (as can be seen by
looking at the orig.tar). I did not change these files, I tried to take
them out. It real
I'm not arguing about the new upstream tarball. The changes in debian/
are just huge and there seem to be added *.ex and *.EX changes all over
the place.
Let me know if I looked at the wrong package or something.
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.l
I am sorry, I think I was not clear: the current Debian libpst package
is incompatible with the Evolution needs. This is why I am proposing the
*other* fork: this fork has been continuously developed (as opposed to
the Debian's, where, pretty much, only maintenance patches are applied.
So. If Evo
To review the package I just diff-ed the two debian/ directories (got
the old package by running "apt-get source libpst"), and I noticed that
you have added a bunch of new files. Why did you not re-use the old
packaging?
Check out https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/PackageUpdate
as wel
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #512909
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512909
** Also affects: libpst (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512909
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.fi
I have opened an upgrade request on Debian, and am waiting on
confirmation. I have no idea if I used the correct format for the
request, though.
--
Please upgrade libpst from upstream at www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317602
You received this bug notification because y
I have packaged libpst-0.6.25 in my PPA
(https://launchpad.net/~hggdh2/+archive). I would like feedback on it so
that I can correct packaging errors that I am certain I did.
Please note that upstream provides the distribution tarball pre-
debianised; unfortunately, this does not work, and required
26 matches
Mail list logo
