[Bug 371105] Re: Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format.

2009-05-03 Thread David Kohen
The code is the same in the current SVN. The bug is caused when the "dot" command is run with non-latin1 characters, the documentation of GraphViz mentions it: http://www.graphviz.org/doc/info/output.html#d:ps The fact whether the problem is common or not is irrelevant, since the code does someth

[Bug 371105] Re: Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format.

2009-05-02 Thread Duncan Lithgow
Are you able to test this issue with the current release of GRAMPS, 3.1.1? If it's fixed there then we don't need to apply the patch. Remember to export to xml before upgrade. I don't think it's normal to confirm your own bugs, I mean you can't be totally sure if it's a common problem. But I'll as

[Bug 371105] Re: Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format.

2009-05-02 Thread David Kohen
Should I set it to "fix committed"? ** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: gramps (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Kohen (kohen-d) -- Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371

[Bug 371105] Re: Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format.

2009-05-02 Thread David Kohen
** Attachment added: "The fix" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26269644/GRAMPS_int.patch -- Problem with non-latin1 graphs in ghostscript, dot and postscript format. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc