[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-19 Thread Fail2Ban
Switching to Invalid as per http://bugs.debian.org/381729 ** Changed in: teeworlds (Debian) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: teeworlds (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520003 You

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-13 Thread mclaud2000
** Changed in: teeworlds (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: teeworlds (Debian) Status: New = Invalid -- Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520003 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-13 Thread mclaud2000
** Changed in: teeworlds (Debian) Status: Invalid = New -- Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520003 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-13 Thread mclaud2000
Thanks for your comments, but I still think the license of the Teeworlds program is free, here's my to your comments: Christoph Egger: I read the OFL and the commentary of the FSF at http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#Fonts but the FSF nor SIL recommend to use it for software, only

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-13 Thread mclaud2000
In the previous comment: Thanks for your comments, but I still think the license of the Teeworlds program ISN'T free, here's my to your comments: My bad. ** Changed in: teeworlds (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-13 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
mclaud2000 mclaud2000-s825hr+5ij5bdgjk7y7...@public.gmane.org writes: Ansgar Burchardt: You're talking about the Artistic License 1.0 http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_1_0 . That license isn't considered as a free software license by the FSF

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-10 Thread Christoph Egger
If you look more closely you'll notice that this clause is also present in the OFL in the same way which is considered free by both, the FSF and Debian. Point being that you can easily bundle the software and then be allowed again to sell. -- Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in

[Bug 520003] Re: Teeworlds license is non-free. It should be in multiverse.

2010-02-10 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
The Artistic license has also a similar clause: 5. You may charge a reasonable copying fee for any distribution of this Package. You may charge any fee you choose for support of this Package. You may not charge a fee for this Package itself. However, you may distribute this Package in aggregate