[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2007-03-12 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Debian) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh https://launchpad.net/bugs/887 -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2007-03-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Debian) Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Committed -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh https://launchpad.net/bugs/887 -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/universe-bugs

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-09-04 Thread Andy Price
I think this is probably safe to close now. Running gst-blox (the gnu- smalltalk GUI) on my amd64 edgy box works fine. I had a quick scan of the powerpc build log too and i didnt see any blox errors. -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh https://launchpad.net/bugs/887 --

[Bug 887] Re: [Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-09-04 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 04:58 +, Andy Price wrote: I think this is probably safe to close now. Running gst-blox (the gnu- smalltalk GUI) on my amd64 edgy box works fine. I had a quick scan of the powerpc build log too and i didnt see any blox errors. Sounds fine to me -Rob -- GPG key

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-09-04 Thread Andy Price
Great, closing. ** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Fix Released -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh https://launchpad.net/bugs/887 -- universe-bugs mailing list universe-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-08-23 Thread Barry deFreese
Robert. We just uploaded an newer upstream version than Debian has. Do you have Edgy yet? And if so, would you mind checking on this bug? Thank you. ** Changed in: gnu-smalltalk (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Needs Info -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

[Bug 887] Re: [Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-06-08 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 01:30 +, Barry deFreese wrote: I don't see anything in 2.1 in unstable that would make a difference. It's just a dep for libreadline5-dev. Are you saying that a simple rebuild fixes this? Thanks. Yes, once tkConfig.sh is fixed a trivial rebuild will make blox-tk be

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-06-07 Thread Barry deFreese
I don't see anything in 2.1 in unstable that would make a difference. It's just a dep for libreadline5-dev. Are you saying that a simple rebuild fixes this? Thanks. -- blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh https://launchpad.net/bugs/887 -- universe-bugs mailing list

[Bug 887] Re: blox-tk was not built because of bad tkConfig.sh

2006-03-30 Thread mjhooker
Rebuilding the development libraries eliminates the problematic TK_XINCLUDES setting and builds the packages (at least on Debian sid) Please note that the maintainer of gnu-smalltalk in Debian has far more recent packages for gnu-smalltalk that have not been uploaded by a 'sponsor'. please