gharris999;259369 Wrote:
> So, if one doesn't need journaling on a drive (and why would journaling
> be advantageous on a drive that holds only static audio files?) what's
> wrong with using ext2 or even ntfs? Other than journaling, what are
> the big advantages of ext3 over ext2?
>
> It's true
gharris999;259369 Wrote:
> So, if one doesn't need journaling on a drive (and why would journaling
> be advantageous on a drive that holds only static audio files?) what's
> wrong with using ext2 or even ntfs? Other than journaling, what are
> the big advantages of ext3 over ext2?
As many peopl
As far as I understand it, if you're not making modifications then ext3
is approximately the same as ext2 (and, from memory, read performance is
the same). However, I don't believe there's much of an overhead in 3
over 2 (again, from memory), so I personally would just plump for 3.
You're maybe goi
bvis wrote:
> I have a Buffalo HD-HG400LAN that I would like to run slimserver on. I
> don't have any Linux knowledge to do the installation myself. Is there
> any self install software available for this or is there anyone willing
> to install it for me for a fee?
I have done several installs o
EricGo;259566 Wrote:
> Hi Pippin,
>
> All connections go through the same combo router/WAP device. I also
> thought a firewall is disrupting things, but my admittedly novice
> poking through the network related control panels on the Ubuntu box
> didn't find anything obvious to change. If it is o
