Guys, anyone wishing to say anything about what was Community Squeeze
OS, please post here, rather than in the release thread. That thread
needs to end with the message that CSOS is no longer available and that
no-one should be purchasing Wandboards with the intention of running it
on them.
I am
Just a quick question: If someone already had a OS19 R7 image and was
quite happy playing files up to 24/96 via usb from a wandboard, what
would the F20 have given or indeed any future updates?
tobyjug's Profile: http://for
Clive,
Truly sorry things have ended as they have and with you in the mire.
I'm not sure I can do the "FrankenWandBoard" justice, it should probably
go to the highest bidder anyway. But if you want to off load another
Wandboard, I'd be happy to give you full retail price for it, especially
if i
tobyjug wrote:
> Just a quick question: If someone already had a OS19 R7 image and was
> quite happy playing files up to 24/96 via usb from a wandboard, what
> would the F20 have given or indeed any future updates?
On the USB side of things, the F20 image would have made no differences.
It was a
Krisbee wrote:
> I'm not sure I can do the "FrankenWandBoard" justice, it should probably
> go to the highest bidder anyway.
Have had a bit of banter back and forth via PM and email today, and that
seems to be the general consensus of opinion, that I should ebay it to
the highest bidder. Sti
Curious to see the pics of your "FrankenWandBoard".
Would selling that board not add to the troubles you already have; I
mean you probably need to supply some software with it as well?
'M-DAC' (http://www.audiolab.co.uk/M-DAC%20Series.aspx?lang=En) ->
'Cambridge Audio Azur 840E'
(http://www.ca
I just want to thank you for everything you've done. I'm running two
Wandboards at home and have set up two others for friends who liked the
whole Squeezebox idea but didn't want to load down their existing
computers even more. Your good deeds will live on for years to come.
--
JackofAll:
As someone who has been harassed by frivolous litigation for 16 years
(and counting since we still aren't at a resolution) I truly feel for
you. My hope for you is that you can demonstrate the frivolity of the
claim and when you prevail, at least you are in the "English System" as
oppo
Did the OS image include an Mp3 player? I would think that alone could
be grounds for law suits.
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthrea
rmac321 wrote:
> JackofAll:
> Don't know what the legal/financial/tax implications might be, but
> should you decide to start some type of legal defense fund, post a link
> here so we can "express our gratitude" to you for all your time and
> effort.
'M-DAC' (http://www.audiolab.co.uk/M-DAC%20
rmac321 wrote:
> JackofAll:
> Don't know what the legal/financial/tax implications might be, but
> should you decide to start some type of legal defense fund, post a link
> here so we can "express our gratitude" to you for all your time and
> effort.
++1
---
rmac321 wrote:
> JackofAll:
> Don't know what the legal/financial/tax implications might be, but
> should you decide to start some type of legal defense fund, post a link
> here so we can "express our gratitude" to you for all your time and
> effort.
Primary system: Wandboard Quad/Dual with CS
rmac321 wrote:
> JackofAll:
> Don't know what the legal/financial/tax implications might be, but
> should you decide to start some type of legal defense fund, post a link
> here so we can "express our gratitude" to you for all your time and
> effort.
After all the work you guys put into this :(
I really wish we'd have been able to do something together now. I never
thought CSOS would end up like this.. Unfortunately, your
hardware/software platform wasn't quite the perfect fit for us (although
I have very much regretted trying to go it al
Reading through things further, it appears that I may not really
understand the nature of events here.
Either way.. it's a damn shame when things turn out this way.
mintaudio's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member
mintaudio wrote:
> Reading through things further, it appears that I may not really
> understand the nature of events here.
>
> Either way.. it's a damn shame when things turn out this way.
Not many of us do we simply don't have the information :confused: and
probably we will not get to know ei
rmac321 wrote:
> JackofAll:
> Don't know what the legal/financial/tax implications might be, but
> should you decide to start some type of legal defense fund, post a link
> here so we can "express our gratitude" to you for all your time and
> effort.
Best Regards,
Gandhi
not often enough well
I have struck a deal with a commercial "entity" to put the src rpms back
online for what was the Community Squeeze Fedora 19 based release. Just
to be clear, there will be no binary packages or images. This is just
about getting the source rpm packages back online so I am in compliance
with the GP
JackOfAll wrote:
> I have struck a deal with a commercial "entity"
Glad to hear things are starting to work out for you Clive.
'M-DAC' (http://www.audiolab.co.uk/M-DAC%20Series.aspx?lang=En) ->
'Cambridge Audio Azur 840E'
(http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/products/azur-840e-pre-amplifier) ->
'F
JackOfAll wrote:
> I have struck a deal with a commercial "entity" to put the src rpms back
> online for what was the Community Squeeze Fedora 19 based release. Just
> to be clear, there will be no binary packages or images. This is just
> about getting the source rpm packages back online so I am
Pascal Hibon wrote:
> Glad to hear things are starting to work out for you Clive.
I wouldn't go that far. LOL.
Actually, from the community side of things, it is a crap deal. It has
cost me the Bone Player design and software that I would have released
under the GPL. I'm really not happy about
JackOfAll wrote:
> I wouldn't go that far. LOL.
>
> Actually, from the community side of things, it is a crap deal. It has
> cost me the Bone Player design and software that I would have released
> under the GPL. I'm really not happy about the total commercialisation of
> the Bone Player. I was
JackOfAll wrote:
> ... what was going to be the "LMS on Fedora" repo will appear, but now
> under a different name. It will only contain the generic packages, but
> the clients, (squeezelite and jivelite), will be packaged for F20 (and
> F21 rawhide) i386/x86_64/arm, and anyone will be welcome to
gbcox wrote:
> Thank you! A major relief that the Fedora repo will be back online.
You shouldn't need to do anything. Once the CS repo is back online,
there will be one new repo package, (the only binary rpm package that
will be provided as part of the CS repo being back online), that
'obsolete
JackOfAll wrote:
> You shouldn't need to do anything. Once the CS repo is back online,
> there will be one new repo package, (the only binary rpm package that
> will be provided as part of the CS repo being back online), that
> 'obsoletes' the old CS repo package and should be picked up
> automat
Hi, can someone tell me exactly the command I need to perform the
update? Also, is there a way to install flirc support?
Thanks!
Hammer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=62334
View this thread: ht
26 matches
Mail list logo
