Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-06-04 Thread Eric Dalquist
Ah, So that is fixed in the import scripts in trunk, I forgot to mention that part of the commit. The .channel and .layout import scripts replace any character in an fname that doesn't match [\w-] with an _ -Eric Cris J Holdorph wrote: I think you misunderstand what I'm getting at. If you

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-06-04 Thread Cris J Holdorph
I think you misunderstand what I'm getting at. If you have an existing portal you want to upgrade to uPortal 3.2 when it comes out. And if you have existing channels that *you* added that did not conform to the new naming conventions, then they would not import properly. I guess we can simp

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-06-04 Thread Eric Dalquist
I believe the export scripts are unaffected by these changes. Are they failing for you? Cris J Holdorph wrote: you might want to do some work on the export scripts, so people can't export something they can't then turn around and import. Cris J H Eric Dalquist wrote: In continuation of

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-06-04 Thread Cris J Holdorph
you might want to do some work on the export scripts, so people can't export something they can't then turn around and import. Cris J H Eric Dalquist wrote: In continuation of this great work I'm working on doing additional cleanup of the channel definition object model. One of these chan

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-06-04 Thread Eric Dalquist
In continuation of this great work I'm working on doing additional cleanup of the channel definition object model. One of these changes is enforcing further restrictions on FNames. I'm committing some changes that now enforce that all channel fnames can only contain characters [a-zA-Z0-9_-]. We

Re:[uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-05-22 Thread Jen Bourey
The new Portlet Administration Portlet is now the default channel managing utility in uPortal. If you notice any bugs, please let me know! The parameter-setting screen in particular still has a few rough edges, but you should be able to use the portlet to successfully modify, delete, and create c

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-05-20 Thread Gary Thompson
(Arizona) Subject: Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047) +1 as well. If we can perhaps get this switch done by the end of next week I could get a 3.2.0-M1 release and quickstart (before I disappear into a 3 week vacation in June) to give people a chance to play wi

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-05-20 Thread Eric Dalquist
+1 as well. If we can perhaps get this switch done by the end of next week I could get a 3.2.0-M1 release and quickstart (before I disappear into a 3 week vacation in June) to give people a chance to play with the new portlet manager and provide feedback. -Eric Cris J Holdorph wrote: +1 for

Re: [uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-05-20 Thread Cris J Holdorph
+1 for removing the old CChannelManager and switching over to the new one in trunk. I don't say this lightly either. I know there is some risk here, but I think this is a HUGE improvement and is worth the risk. Cris J H Jen Bourey wrote: Hi all, The new Portlet Administration Portlet

[uportal-dev] Portlet Administration Portlet Update (UP-2047)

2009-05-20 Thread Jen Bourey
Hi all, The new Portlet Administration Portlet described by JIRA entry UP-2047 is now in the trunk, and I believe we've updated it to include all features currently available in CChannelManager. I would like to be able to switch the admin link in the layout over to use this new portlet. Does any