Hi Mark,
just like you defined the tag I think you can redefine the
I had an issue with outer joins a while ago, it's not exactly what you
describe but maybe the answer could help:
http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/2017-July/002645.html
Cheers
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019, 13:56 Simon Van Casteren
wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> Something that's been bothering me
I've also run into this issue a while ago. I haven't found anything in a
standard library, but I did find a function similar to yours in UPO so I
copied it.
Would it be worth adding to Top?
Or maybe support for IN could be added to the compiler?
___
Ur
suggest. I prefer to settle configuration at compile time, so that
> the compiler can specialize code to chosen settings. Have you considered
> that path, too?
>
>
> On 01/29/2018 10:43 AM, Athene Noctua wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I find it useful to have a
Hi all,
I find it useful to have a module for storing global configuration
settings and the likes in my applications, using a single table with
key and value fields and a simple get/set interface. Unfortunately
this approach breaks the nice encapsulation properties you get with
Ur/Web tables, as
e other
> operand.
>
> I don't see a way around changing types to indicate that any column of an
> outer-joined table could be null.
>
> On 07/03/2017 02:58 PM, Athene Noctua wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble with a query using multiple joins, one of which is an
>>
