Yes, "IN" isn't supported by Ur/Web at the moment, and I would be glad
to see a PR adding support! It could probably be as simple as modeling
the second argument of "IN" as a regular Ur/Web list, processed
internally with a fold similar to what Simon wrote externally (but
generating "IN" synta
Hi Simon,
сб, 12 янв. 2019 г. в 16:15, Simon Van Casteren :
>
> Hi,
>
> Am I correct in thinking that the standard library/compiler doesn't support
> SQL "IN" statements? It's something that I use a lot in my programs, and in
> psql for example you can just do:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM uw_lesson_less
I've also run into this issue a while ago. I haven't found anything in a
standard library, but I did find a function similar to yours in UPO so I
copied it.
Would it be worth adding to Top?
Or maybe support for IN could be added to the compiler?
___
Ur ma
Hi,
Am I correct in thinking that the standard library/compiler doesn't support
SQL "IN" statements? It's something that I use a lot in my programs, and in
psql for example you can just do:
SELECT *
FROM uw_lesson_lessons
WHERE uw_id in (1, 2, 3)
I made my own function to handle this, using a bu
