Dear List Folks,
If you haven't already come across it, you might want to take a look
at our proof of concept game, Galactic Gauntlet. It helps show off
the new possibilities of LiveCode 5, and you can download the source
code and take a look here:
On Oct 17, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Maybe this isn't the best method to accomplish what I need, but can anyone
see why this is failing?
Scott, when you execute the do, it's getting the text of the button and
passing that along instead of the long id that's coming into
The thing that strikes me looking at Unity is how similar it is to
Windowmaker! Back to the future with those big icons down the side of the
desktop.
Well, the one person I put in Windowmaker for is fine with it. So maybe
they have a point? Dunno.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Roger:
What you're seeing is the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the player
being swapped for some reason (seems like a bug in 4.6.4). If you set the
width/height of the player to its formatted dimensions, you should be OK.
set the width of player 1 to the formattedWidth of player 1
Al,
This all started while was teaching at the university and working with a local
grade school teacher. At that time Logo was all the rage and I thought it would
be an ideal language in which young children might solve interesting physics
problems, essentially implement numerical methods to
I think Disk Warrior will create a new copy of the partition map, but he
doesn't have one apparently. Not sure if Disk Warrior will deal with that.
Bob
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Tim Selander wrote:
I used Disk Warrior with great success many times in the OS9 days; not sure
if they
Suggestion for RunRev: Put a Demo Mode in this game so those of us who don't
really want to master the game -- just see what LC can do -- can observe the
game in action without having to play it.
-- Tom Bodine
--
View this message in context:
On Oct 17, 2011, at 12:30 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
...this command can be triggered by any external object via the above router
command (in the same script) with something like this:
runPrivateCommand getObjectID,long id of long id of btw 1
I think you can even use:
runPrivateCommand
Hi All!
I have a little project that is using SQLite to save user data. Essentially,
each user has their own table created in the database and it saves records
consisting of text content in mutiple fields in each record. The idea was in a
school situation, where multiple students using the
Typically what most do is issue a dump of the sql database. If it is not too
large then this is workable. It produces a text file that can then be imported
into other databases.
But why not have your app access the mySQL database online to begin with? You
would need to modify the table
It's my belief that SqLite databases tend to be small enough that you can just
copy the entire file back to a main server and not bother doing a sync of the
data it contains. Probably be heck-a faster than a whole bunch of selects and
updates and inserts from sqLite on a desktop to MySQL on a
Sounds like what you want to is sync the databases accounting for any
inserts, deletes, updates on either database. That gets pretty complicated!
I think I'd probably take the route of accessing the remote mySQL db all
the time if it's at all feasible and i not, then using ftp to
upload/download
Hi Scott,
I'm sure you have good reasons but I'm curious about why you would want to
classify a handler as private if you know you will need to access it from
outside the script that it's in?
Pete
Molly's Revenge http://www.mollysrevenge.com
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Scott Rossi
Hi Joe and Jim,
Joe, many thanks for your kind words!
I always hope that my scripting experiments
would do more good than harm and at least
should be useful to show the Do's and Don'ts
on the specific topics that I worked with.
James Hurley wrote:
[snip]
Kevin and I discussed the
I'm trying to drag and drop a column from a datagrid onto another datagrid
on the same card. Everything works fine when I'm testing (the stack is
toplevel), but when I use it for real (the stack is modal), none of the
dragxxx handlers are being called.
I'm really hoping the reason is that LC
Alex:
When I first got involved with Revolution I had hoped that it would just be an
up-todate HC; but, alas, it began to get too complicated for the average
hobbyist, so many of the HC users just never came aboard. I don't blame them. I
was very close to being one who didn't myself. Over the
Hi Joe,
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
When I first got involved with Revolution I had hoped
that it would just be an up-todate HC; but, alas, it
began to get too complicated for the average hobbyist,
so many of the HC users just never came aboard.
I don't blame them. I was very close to being
On 17.10.2011 at 12:47 Uhr -0700 John Patten apparently wrote:
Hi All!
I have a little project that is using SQLite to save user data.
Essentially, each user has their own table created in the database
and it saves records consisting of text content in mutiple fields in
each record. The idea
Alex,
I'm sure you'll eventually take advantage of all that LC comes to offer, and
they love you for your outside the box thinking and doing; but you're far more
imaginative than the average potential LC user.
Frankly, I'd love to be in your boots. (smile)
Joe Wilkins
On Oct 17, 2011, at
Pete-
Monday, October 17, 2011, 2:01:13 PM, you wrote:
Hi Scott,
I'm sure you have good reasons but I'm curious about why you would want to
classify a handler as private if you know you will need to access it from
outside the script that it's in?
Thanks. You beat me to it. This has been
Recently, Mark Wieder wrote:
I'm sure you have good reasons but I'm curious about why you would want to
classify a handler as private if you know you will need to access it from
outside the script that it's in?
Thanks. You beat me to it. This has been bothering me all day. Knowing
Scott,
21 matches
Mail list logo
