Hello List,
An Android question.
For "play" to work with a player object (which refers to an audio mp3
file), must "visible" be set to "true" during the mobileControlCreate?
Or the rect values be set to within the card's rect?
It seems they must.
Because the following works:
mobileCont
On 18/05/12 08:38, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/18/12 12:14 AM, Richmond wrote:
On 17/05/12 23:34, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/17/12 2:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
How would you go about saving a Livecode stack for a Classic Mac?
Save it in the oldest legacy format (2.4) and run it with the
last-ava
On 5/18/12 12:14 AM, Richmond wrote:
On 17/05/12 23:34, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/17/12 2:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
How would you go about saving a Livecode stack for a Classic Mac?
Save it in the oldest legacy format (2.4) and run it with the
last-available classic engine.
I would be jolly
On 18/05/12 02:53, -=>JB<=- wrote:
I thought there was an option to save it that way. In the
past they could.
"The past is another country, and they do things differently there." J.
P. Hartley.
-=>JB<=-
On May 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 05/17/2012 10:14 PM, -=>JB<=- wr
On 17/05/12 23:34, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/17/12 2:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
How would you go about saving a Livecode stack for a Classic Mac?
Save it in the oldest legacy format (2.4) and run it with the
last-available classic engine.
I would be jolly nice if RunRev could make the last
Whoops! I meant when you unintentionally get more than one instance of the
same cycle running.
On May 17, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Nicolas Cueto wrote:
>> Hiccups can happen when you get more than one cycle running.
>
> That just happens to be the case, too. The 2nd cycle rotates a png
> image n-degre
I thought there was an option to save it that way. In the
past they could.
-=>JB<=-
On May 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
> On 05/17/2012 10:14 PM, -=>JB<=- wrote:
>> Making it run on an older mac is where Sheepshaver could make it
>> easier because you can run the hypercard on an Inte
Well, opened up that same stack on my home pc and... the hiccup is gone!
> Hiccups can happen when you get more than one cycle running.
That just happens to be the case, too. The 2nd cycle rotates a png
image n-degrees every x-millisecs.
The rotation too is appearing much cleaner on my home p
On 5/17/12 2:04 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I wonder then, when RunRev is going to shed the whole Backwards
Compatibility ball and chain (at least in respects to Hypercard) and
consider requested changes that cite that as the reason for not doing
so?
What do you think interferes? I haven't found muc
On 5/17/12 2:53 PM, Richmond wrote:
How would you go about saving a Livecode stack for a Classic Mac?
Save it in the oldest legacy format (2.4) and run it with the
last-available classic engine.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software
On 05/17/2012 10:14 PM, -=>JB<=- wrote:
Making it run on an older mac is where Sheepshaver could make it
easier because you can run the hypercard on an Intel mac in Os 9
and below. Also you will be able to test any LiveCode stacks you
save for classic macs.
-=>JB<=-
How would you go about
On 05/17/2012 10:04 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
I wonder then, when RunRev is going to shed the whole Backwards Compatibility
ball and chain (at least in respects to Hypercard) and consider requested
changes that cite that as the reason for not doing so?
"Backwards Compatibility" is, probably, alt
Making it run on an older mac is where Sheepshaver could make it
easier because you can run the hypercard on an Intel mac in Os 9
and below. Also you will be able to test any LiveCode stacks you
save for classic macs.
-=>JB<=-
On May 17, 2012, at 11:52 AM, stephen barncard wrote:
> For perspec
I wonder then, when RunRev is going to shed the whole Backwards Compatibility
ball and chain (at least in respects to Hypercard) and consider requested
changes that cite that as the reason for not doing so?
Bob
On May 17, 2012, at 11:52 AM, stephen barncard wrote:
> Even back then the obsol
Here is an idea of something to accomplish that I used on hypercard stack.
There was an XCMD named star that would add a frame around a picture
and would have rotating balls between the frame and the picture.
I was not trying to do that and like I said I was just messing around with
OS 9 on an Int
For perspective, when I started a large HC stack conversion to Rev project
in 2006, my first task was to make the stack run on an older mac, note its
functionality, and get the data out. The functions of the custom XCMD were
completely replaced with native Rev code and it was very fast. Even back
t
I think anything with a limited number of cards and no xcmd's could be
converted fairly easily. But a lot of people have problems when they pull in
stacks where they have thousands of cards, as the engine is not optimized for
that, as has been discussed in other threads. As usual, the correct an
All definitely good points that would me someone question if they
should ever consider trying to make any hypercard code work.
-=>JB<=-
On May 17, 2012, at 11:34 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
> Also consider it was written and compiled for an OS that used a totally
> different graphics engine called
Also consider it was written and compiled for an OS that used a totally
different graphics engine called Quickdraw. I have serious doubts it would work
today in Quartz. It's going to have to be rewritten methinks.
Bob
On May 17, 2012, at 11:15 AM, stephen barncard wrote:
> most likely it was
Actually I don't need to acomplish anything. I recently installed
Sheepshaver and was messing around with some hypercard
stuff I wrote years ago but the code was not with the stacks I
tossed on to Sheepshaver which got me wondering.
It was a good point you made about probably not working with
Int
most likely it was compiled for Power PC, Intel macs didn't exist then. I
would venture to say that they wouldn't work. Anyway Livecode is so fast
and versatile that most of the functions that needed XCMDs can all be done
in native Livecode. The time it would take to convert could be spent
re-desig
On 05/17/2012 07:08 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Imagine if Facebook was bipolar: "I like! I don't like! I like! I don't like!
..."
Miind you it would be good if Facebook has, as well as 'Like',
'dislike', 'despise'. and so on.
Bob
On May 17, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Thu, Ma
Imagine if Facebook was bipolar: "I like! I don't like! I like! I don't
like! ..."
Bob
On May 17, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Richmond wrote:
>
>> Maybe Duckduckgo.com suffers from bipolar disorder. LOL!
>>
>
> That would only be the case if tom
I read that article once, and I thought it was very well done, but the rest of
my personalities don't agree.
Bob
On May 17, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote:
> On May 15, 2012, at 10:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> On 5/15/12 6:21 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote:
>>> On 16/05/
To get a more uniform timing, do the send at the start of the script (but after
your exit test). This can easily hog the computer if the wheel speed is high,
though. Using a minimum period (perhaps in addition testing 'done') might
help, but it should be higher, say .3 seconds. The page on
...indeed, would it be nit-picking to suggest debugging with a fine-tooth comb?
:-)
Best,
Keith..
On 17 May 2012, at 16:42, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote:
> On May 16, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>
>> It's better than the typo I usually make, where it comes out LiceCode.
>
> Ooooh, now *
On May 16, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> It's better than the typo I usually make, where it comes out LiceCode.
Ooooh, now *that's* buggy code...
-- Peter
Peter M. Brigham
pmb...@gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
___
use-livecode ma
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Richmond wrote:
> Maybe Duckduckgo.com suffers from bipolar disorder. LOL!
>
That would only be the case if tomorrow Peter's site is at the top of the
list, and the day after, it's back on page 213+ ;-) Image what you'd find
with a bipolar search engine!
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Richmond wrote:
>
> That is all very well and good; but I am looking for a flash when I stay
> on the same card.
>
> Then, assuming you are talking about staying on card 1
on mouseUp
visual effect dissolve very fast inverse
go to card 1
end mouseUp
Or, if yo
Hi Mark,
That is cool !!
I just downloaded the script. I tired yesterday and for some
reason it would stall instead of downloading.
-=>JB<=-
On May 17, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> It is definitely possible to make an XCMD for this. It will use the same api
> as t
On 17/05/12 15:24, Peter M. Brigham, MD wrote:
On May 15, 2012, at 10:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 5/15/12 6:21 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote:
On 16/05/2012, at 8:40 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
Ah, another conspiracy theorist I see!
All conspiracy theories aside, there *is* something to
On May 15, 2012, at 10:06 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> On 5/15/12 6:21 PM, Igor de Oliveira Couto wrote:
>> On 16/05/2012, at 8:40 AM, Peter Haworth wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, another conspiracy theorist I see!
>>
>> All conspiracy theories aside, there *is* something to be said about giving
>> Google, F
Hi JB,
It is definitely possible to make an XCMD for this. It will use the same api as
the applescript I posted a link to.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 5
LiveCode supports the HyperCard 1.x XCMD model (which means that most XCMDs and
XFCNs
that don’t display a window will work in LiveCode without modification)
If I remember correctly there was a Flash XCMD for hyperCard and the original
Flash used may
have been an XCMD. These did not call a wind
LiveCode
Lessons and Tutorials
HyperCard
LiveCode supports the HyperCard 1.x XCMD model (which means that most XCMDs and
XFCNs
that don’t display a window will work in LiveCode without modification)Tutorials
What if I have the binary code of a XCMD I wrote in hyperCard is there a way to
use it
Original Message
Subject:Re: I want to be a flasher.
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:15:47 +0300
From: Richmond
To: How to use LiveCode
On 05/16/2012 09:31 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I swear there was a "flash" command in RunRev/Livecode which w
On 05/16/2012 09:31 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Richmond wrote:
I swear there was a "flash" command in RunRev/Livecode which would flash
the screen.
However, having looked back at RunRev 2.2.1 I think I am wrong.
SO . . . does anybody know how to do this sort of thing:
on mouseUp
invert scre
No really good ideas, but a couple of tings you might try
1. log the actual time when you do the 'send' and when you are
re-awakened and see if there is anything to be seen in the way of a pattern
on dingDing
if the cpFlag of me is false then exit dingDing
put "about to play" &&
On 05/17/2012 08:53 AM, Scott Rossi wrote:
This seems to get pretty close, (but I ran into some intermittent [what seem
to be] card caching issues):
command flashThisCard
put the effectRate into ER
set the effectRate to 750
if version() < 5 then
lock screen
else do "lock s
Hello,
It is not the same way but have you see or experiment "SunnYbeep-sound effects"
an free external from Thierry Douez you can find on revOnline ?
It is a free part of "SunnYmidi" external I use for musical application...
But it is Mac only...
Bon souvenir de Paris
René
Le 17 mai 2012 à 09:03
Thanks, Scott.
Clipping isn't the problem. The send-in milliseconds can be much
longer than the sound file's milliseconds length, and still there's a
hiccup in the loop.
And in the past I've tried "wait until the sound" is done too, but
still get hiccups in the send loop after the nth time.
Y
41 matches
Mail list logo
