For #1:
if the environment is development then
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:47 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
1) What's the simplest way to test if running under the LC IDE versus as a
standalone?
2) For a Mac standalone, how do I get the full path of the .app file,
Hi Richard,
I have made some more tests this morning after a fresh restart of my
computer and no other tasks running,
Version 5.5.4: 3 sec
Version 6.1: 2 sec
Version 6.5.2: 3 sec
Version 6.6.2: 290-460 sec
So there is no real difference for me up to version 6.5.2. The huge delay of
290-460 sec in
Le 20 août 2014 à 03:48, Peter Haworth p...@lcsql.com a écrit :
Yes, thanks Alex, I missed that. It seems that multiply also works that
way so I guess the matrixMultiply command must be like the transpose
command - works on the old style arrays only. I wonder why they don't mark
those
Ive got a user who is running Ubuntu and all the input boxes have a black
background so he cannot see what he is entering or selecting.
Ive tried an install of the same version of Ubuntu here and its working fine
for me.
Any ideas what may be causing this and how to work around it?
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
1) What's the simplest way to test if running under the LC IDE versus as a
standalone?
2) For a Mac standalone, how do I get the full path of the .app file,
which is actually a directory? I'm trying to get the
Thanks to thanks to Peter Haworth, Alex Tweedly and Jacques Hausser for helping
me understand why i'm confused! I have tried to start a conversation on the
improve list about Jacques' suggestion.
Graham
On 20 Aug 2014, at 10:02, Jacques Hausser jacques.haus...@unil.ch wrote:
Le 20 août
On 20/08/14 12:00, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Hi Andrew,
If I'm not mistaken, this happens with fields that have their
backColor set to empty. Set the backColor of the fields to 255,255,255
and it should be fine (or use 254,254,254 for instance).
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
I have
On Aug 20, 2014, at 2:51 AM, Devin Asay devina...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 11:47 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
1) What's the simplest way to test if running under the LC IDE versus as a
standalone?
2) For a Mac standalone, how do I get the full path of
Dear List Members.
We are pleased to announce the release of LiveCode 7.0 DP10.
* Warning, this is a pre-release with new features which have the potential
to cause issues. Please ensure you backup your stacks before testing this
release.*
*Release Focus*
17 bug fixes
*Important Changes*
-
So: yesterday,
I installed a 1.5 TB SATA Hard Disk into the machine
and partitioned it into 6 bits.
I installed Mac OS 10.5.8 onto one partition.
Today I am installing Mac OS 10.4.11 onto another partition . . .
--
The installer (as previously mentioned) for
Thanks Mark,
Do you know of any way to replicate the issue as I cannot seem to do it. Ive
tried a few builds of Ubuntu so I think it may be relevant to the graphics card.
Ideally if i can repllicate it, I can go through the project and make sure ive
not missed any fields.
Thanks
Andy
On
Is your problem possibly related to the problem that I’m having with 6.6.2?
When I press cmd-O, it takes forever for the open window to show up. It’s been
suggested that this delay might be related to the fact that I have LiveCode
listed in System Preferences: Security Privacy: Accessibility.
Peter Haworth wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
But you get them (I think) just with add, etc.
Yes, thanks Alex, I missed that. It seems that multiply also works
that way so I guess the matrixMultiply command must be like the
transpose command - works on the old
Across many programming languages we see two primary types of arrays:
indexed and associative.
Both are useful, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. Neither
is broken, and nether is a complete superset of the other.
All arrays offer a single variable as a collection of pointers to
Sorry I meant long name.
Bob S
On Aug 19, 2014, at 22:47 , Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
1) What's the simplest way to test if running under the LC IDE versus as a
standalone?
2) For a Mac standalone, how do I get the full path of the .app file,
which is actually a
I don’t have a standalone to test with at the moment but try the full name of
the stack.
Bob S
On Aug 19, 2014, at 22:47 , Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
1) What's the simplest way to test if running under the LC IDE versus as a
standalone?
2) For a Mac standalone, how do
Andrew Henshaw wrote:
Do you know of any way to replicate the issue as I cannot seem to do
it. Ive tried a few builds of Ubuntu so I think it may be relevant
to the graphics card.
Ideally if i can repllicate it, I can go through the project and
make sure ive not missed any fields.
I
How about using {} instead of []?
Bob S
On Aug 20, 2014, at 07:24 , Richard Gaskin
ambassa...@fourthworld.commailto:ambassa...@fourthworld.com wrote:
So if we were to propose that LiveCode add indexed arrays, the first thing
we'll want to do is come up with the syntax for specifying those
that was a little too creepy.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Richmond richmondmathew...@gmail.com
wrote:
It is 'odd' how the coded messages I keep getting in my Spam box inspire
me to
post on the Livecode Use-List.
Well I certainly intend to.
Currently developing an interface to input
I was thinking :
set the indexedarray of myArray to true
set the indexedarray of myArray to false
but then what happens when you switch that property from true
to false for the same array within a handler ?
Same question for {} notation : what happens when the same
handler contains these 2
Hi Andrew,
Which version of LiveCode is the user using? Is it possible that the
user saw this in a standalone that was created with version 5.x or
earlier? Knowing the Ubuntu version number would also help.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software
Richard,
I'm still pretty new to livecode, so my first exposure to LC arrays left me a
bit skeptical. I am an experienced Director programmer and had gotten very
fluent with lingo property lists, which is the closest analogy to the LC
array. In Lingo (Director's main language), there are
Its compiled with Livecode 6.6.2, and he has Ubuntu 14 apparently.
Ive tested it here on the latest Ubuntu and Mint distributions and it works
fine for me so Im guessing its something specific to the setup.
On 20 Aug 2014, at 16:28, Mark Schonewille m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
transpose command - works on the old style arrays only. I wonder
why they don't mark those commands a deprecated?
Because they still work and are supported for the foreseeable future.
Hi Richard,
I may be
I wouldn't be in favor of using {}. Problem is that LC currently accepts
those characters as delimiters for the keys of an array. I don't use them
on purpose but every now and again I notice I typed one by mistake. Seems
like a backwards compatibility problem.
Pete
lcSQL Software
Peter Haworth wrote:
I may be misunderstanding but does that imply it's still possible to
create old style arrays in Livecode? As a relative newcomer to LC,
I've only ever known about the current form of arrays and wouldn't
know how to set about creating one of the original arrays.
An
Forgot to say that I'm not sure I see the need for indexed arrays. Then
again, I'm also not sure I understand the difference.
If it's just that deleting a key shuffles all the other keys up, it's
pretty trivial to do that in a script as is inserting a new key and
shuffling the other keys down. I
Bill and Richard,
I fully agree with Bill about the ease of implementing the necessary matrix
operations functions in LC language - I did it, actually, for what I needed,
like computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors. It's not even so slow if your
matrices are not enormous ! And just today, I
Jacques Hausser wrote:
I fully agree with Bill about the ease of implementing the necessary
matrix operations functions in LC language - I did it, actually, for
what I needed, like computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors. It's not
even so slow if your matrices are not enormous !
That's
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
get tArray[1,2]
Thanks for the explanation Richard. So the only difference is that they are
one dimensional but the keys can kind of express multiple dimensions by
being numeric and separated by commas? Are the
Peter Haworth wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
get tArray[1,2]
Thanks for the explanation Richard. So the only difference is that they are
one dimensional but the keys can kind of express multiple dimensions by
being numeric and separated by commas? Are the
Richard:
Google “calculate eigenvectors”. There are many references and the code is
pretty standard math, no licensing. It’s taught in most linear algebra classes
at the college level.
Bill
William A. Prothero
http://earthednet.org/
___
use-livecode
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Dan Friedman d...@clearvisiontech.com
wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The entire error string is revdberr, (with the
comma). I tried your suggestion of using revExecuteSQL instead of
revDataFromQuery() and I did not get the error. So at least I have a
suitable
Using the revExecuteSQL returns the number of deleted/inserted/updated rows
in the result. Then the test is:
If the result is not a number then
--Error code here
End if
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From:
Le 20 août 2014 à 19:32, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com a écrit :
Jacques Hausser wrote:
I fully agree with Bill about the ease of implementing the necessary
matrix operations functions in LC language - I did it, actually, for
what I needed, like computing eigenvalues and
Yes, but there is no panic here it's a false error seemingly caused by
using revDataFromQuery for something other than a SELECT statement.
I know it shouldn't do that and that you have a bug at the QCC about it but
bottom line is, using revDataFromQuery or revQueryDatabase to execute
anything
+1
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Services
rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
-Original Message-
From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf
Of Peter Haworth
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 8:11 PM
To: How to use LiveCode
Subject: Re:
Why doesn't this code work?
on menuPick pItemName
go card pItemName
end menuPick
where the comboBox has a list of card names.
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage
Works fine for me in LC 5.5.5, LC 6.6.2 LC 7.0(dp10) on Mac OS X 10.8.5 and
in LC 6.6.2 on Windows 7.
Do you see any kind of error?
Paul
On 2014-08-20, at 6:08 PM, revolut...@duncansoftware.on-rev.com wrote:
Why doesn't this code work?
on menuPick pItemName
go card pItemName
end
On 8/20/2014, 8:08 PM, revolut...@duncansoftware.on-rev.com wrote:
Why doesn't this code work?
on menuPick pItemName
go card pItemName
end menuPick
where the comboBox has a list of card names.
Set a breakpoint at the go line and when it pauses, see what's in
pItemName and whether
40 matches
Mail list logo
