Stephen
> On 24 Nov 2014, at 13:28, stephen barncard
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Peter W A Wood
> wrote:
>
>> Some time ago, I ran some tests to measure the comparative startup times
>> of PHP, LiveCode and HTML on On-rev. The two scripts are simple:
>>
>>Livecode
>
On 24 Nov 2014, at 3:29 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> What would it take to make an Apache module for LiveCode?
Apache modules themselves don't look all that complicated. As far as LC goes as
long as you don't support threaded mpms it should be largely a matter of
handling the request and set
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Peter W A Wood
wrote:
> Some time ago, I ran some tests to measure the comparative startup times
> of PHP, LiveCode and HTML on On-rev. The two scripts are simple:
>
> Livecode
> I've started"
> ?>
>
> PHP
> I've started"
> ?>
>
>
Peter Wood wrote:
> The performance of LiveCode and
> PHP would be the same if either PHP
> was being run in the same fashion as
> LiveCode (i.e. using CGI) or there was
> a LiveCode Apache Module.
What would it take to make an Apache module for LiveCode?
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
ht
Stephen
Some time ago, I ran some tests to measure the comparative startup times of
PHP, LiveCode and HTML on On-rev. The two scripts are simple:
Livecode
I've started"
?>
PHP
I've started"
?>
HTML
I've started
Trying these simple pages should
would you consider this script to be comparative to the "complexity" of
phpInfo() ?
anyway I don't think the slowdown I'm seeing at Dreamhost would be caught
in this benchmark. Once LC is loaded, it quite speedy. But on the
server it has to restart for every page load.
my livecode test script wa
In a previous email Richard Gaskin, the LiveCode Community Manager, wrote
"Given the role of memory and performance for scaling, if we want to see LC
Server taken seriously as a professional server tool we need to identify and
eliminate any significant performance difference between it and PHP.”
Richard
As Simon mentioned, “calling” a LiveCode function by running a cgi script will
be slower than a simple function call. Running a very simple LiveCode cgi
script takes a few hundred milliseconds. A function call will take a few
milliseconds.
On my machine, which has a solid-state drive,
I just think Peter means that there would be an additional step in the
process - instead of executing a single script, you are executing 2.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Richard Gaskin
wrote:
> Peter W A Wood wrote:
> > You should be able to use file_get_contents in PHP to do what you
> > wan
Peter W A Wood wrote:
> You should be able to use file_get_contents in PHP to do what you
> want. Though it will take longer to get the results from LiveCode
> than it would from PHP.
Why would that be?
In general (and pre-7.0) LC used to perform roughly on par with PHP.
Where has it fallen dow
Okay, this seems to make sense.
Thanks for your help, I'll give it a go tomorrow..
I'm slowly getting there with PHP, it's just taking a little longer than it
took me to pick up LC...
Nakia Brewer | Technology & Solutions Manager | Equipment Management Solutions
t: (02) 49645051
m: 0458 713 5
Bug 14082 - BTW, I don’t regard the entry as actually erroneous, just
incomplete and misleading!
Graham
> On 22 Nov 2014, at 21:27, Graham Samuel wrote:
>
> OK will do.
>
> G
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On 22 Nov 2014, at 17:19, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> Graham Samuel wrote:
>>
>>> Tha
Yep 'material design' IS nice and can accessed on browsers via Google Polymer
http://itshackademic.com/ - and there are some nice tutorials here
http://itshackademic.com/codelabs
I understand Mozilla has a similar project called 'brick'
(http://brick.mozilla.io/) - but I've never played with brick
Hi
You can also use the curl function if your LC script is located on a server :
$data = 'http://myDomain/lc/myLCscript.lc?a=' . $myVar;
$ch = curl_init();
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $data);
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1);
$output = curl_exec($ch);
curl_close($ch);
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
