Thanks Scott.
I bought it and it works nice.
John Balgenorth
On Jul 30, 2015, at 5:56 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> If your system is OS X:
>
> Icon Slate
> https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/icon-slate/id439697913?mt=12
>
> Only $5, highly recommended.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Rossi
> Creative
Anyone know if this is possible without referencing a windowID?
This fails with a script error:
import snapshot from stack "xyz"
This defaults to selecting a region to capture and then fails:
import snapshot of stack "xyz"
This works, but clips the snapshot if any portion of the stack appears
If your system is OS X:
Icon Slate
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/icon-slate/id439697913?mt=12
Only $5, highly recommended.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev
Thanks Jaque, I forgot about that
program. I have been using it for
years. I think it came out around
system 7 or maybe a ltlle earlier
and is a excellent investment.
John Balgenorth
On Jul 30, 2015, at 5:13 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
> Graphic Converter does it too.
>
> On July 30, 2015 6
Graphic Converter does it too.
On July 30, 2015 6:14:26 PM CDT, JB wrote:
>If you are using a Mac go to the Mac App
>store and do a search for icon. You will
>find quite a few apps for making icons.
>
>Some of them make cost a few dollars but
>the time saved and options may be worth
>it.
>
>The
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
> I'm sure there are other places but there's a free online convertor at
> https://iconverticons.com/online/
>
This was perfect!
My application no longer has a square icon.
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
__
Paul Dupuis writes:
> The recursion issue is of you have a pair (or more) or setProp handlers
> that call back to one another: ie.
Right. There's a special-case trap for that. From the docs:
If you use the set command within a setProp control structure to set the same
custom property for the cu
Paul Dupuis writes:
> Am I missing something else Mark? How do you put a setProp handler in a
> customPropertySet? The handlers have to be in scripts. Do you use
> behaviors to switch between setprop handlers?
Nope - I'm getting distracted by too many things at once.
You're correct - you can't h
If you are using a Mac go to the Mac App
store and do a search for icon. You will
find quite a few apps for making icons.
Some of them make cost a few dollars but
the time saved and options may be worth
it.
They will provide you with the ability to make
and icon for desktop or mobile apps and do
On 7/30/2015 7:00 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I originally thought the following would
> cause a recursion error, because the property being set appears within a
> setProp handler of the same name. Trying this in LC 7.0.5 works, but I
> still see a warning in the docs
On 7/30/2015 6:44 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Paul Dupuis writes:
>
>> it does correctly execute the setProp handler. Much to my surprise. This
>> implies that you can NOT have two custom property sets that have the
>> same property name IF you want to use setprop or getProp handlers with them.
> No,
Maybe I'm missing something, but I originally thought the following would
cause a recursion error, because the property being set appears within a
setProp handler of the same name. Trying this in LC 7.0.5 works, but I
still see a warning in the docs about recursion. So does the following
work onl
Paul Dupuis writes:
> it does correctly execute the setProp handler. Much to my surprise. This
> implies that you can NOT have two custom property sets that have the
> same property name IF you want to use setprop or getProp handlers with them.
No, that's the point of the custom property sets.
T
I wonder if the mouseUp script is - set the mySet["myNumber"] of me to 90 -
whether the setProp handler for myNumber still is executed.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:22 PM Paul Dupuis wrote:
> On 7/30/2015 5:31 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> > Within the customPropertySet you just have:
> >
> > setProp
On 7/30/2015 5:31 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Within the customPropertySet you just have:
>
> setProp property1 pValue
> set the property1 of me to pValue
> end property1
>
> setProp property2 pValue
> set the property2 of me to pValue
> end property2
Thanks Mark. I am interested in avoiding the
Paul Dupuis writes:
>
> On 7/30/2015 4:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> > Paul Dupuis ...> writes:
> >
> >> The LC 6.7.5 dictionary entry for setProp has the following:
> >>
> >> If the custom property you want to control is in a custom property set,
> >> use array notation in the first line of the
On 7/30/2015 4:34 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
> Paul Dupuis writes:
>
>> The LC 6.7.5 dictionary entry for setProp has the following:
>>
>> If the custom property you want to control is in a custom property set,
>> use array notation in the first line of the setProp handler, as in the
>> following exam
I'm sure there are other places but there's a free online convertor at
https://iconverticons.com/online/
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:20 PM Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> Quite some time ago, I converted a png to a .icons file on OS X.
>
> And I have absolutely no memory of what I did to use it.
>
> I've edi
Paul Dupuis writes:
>
> The LC 6.7.5 dictionary entry for setProp has the following:
>
> If the custom property you want to control is in a custom property set,
> use array notation in the first line of the setProp handler, as in the
> following example:
Interesting. I do see that in the docum
Quite some time ago, I converted a png to a .icons file on OS X.
And I have absolutely no memory of what I did to use it.
I've edited the icons, and need to do it again.
Could anyone spare a hint?
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
___
us
Good questions Ralph, not sure I have definitive answers. I do know that
even if your queries are executed by PHP scripts on your sever, there are
ways for SQL injection attacks to occur, although it's much more
complicated. There's a good Wikipedia article on this at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wik
Injection attacks are caused by a lack of validation of the inputs used to
construct a query - they are independent of any transport mechanism.
Even fronting db access with a web service will cause a vector for injection
attacks if the web service is constructing query strings without validating
Peter,
If you using an SSL connection to the DB is there still "SQL injection" risks?
3...2...1... and Mark Wieder says "Use a web service"
Then I will +1 it. I have almost completely moved to the https web service
model for remote DB access.
Ralph DiMola
IT Director
Evergreen Information Serv
I feel I should point out that you are leaving yourself wide open to SQL
injection attacks by not using the placeholder method of passing data to
SQL statements. Not enough space to detail how that works here but just
Google "SQL injection" on the web to see a sample of the really bad things
that
If you use the placeholder method, there is no need to sanitize the
strings, that's the point of using it. Although I guess it depends on what
you mean by "sanitize".
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:11 AM Bob Sneidar
wrote:
> Yes it does. If you use the placeholder method (I am not really sure what
>
The LC 6.7.5 dictionary entry for setProp has the following:
If the custom property you want to control is in a custom property set,
use array notation in the first line of the setProp handler, as in the
following example:
setProp mySet[thisProperty] newValue
if thisProperty is "that" then put
Hi LiveCode Community,
If you're an app builder, you might want to know how to make your app into
a full flourishing business. Lots of our community members have done this
successfully and we'd like to see you succeed in this way, too.
Our Business Developer, Iain Morrison, discusses how to make
Yes it does. If you use the placeholder method (I am not really sure what to
call it at this point) then sqlYoga sanitizes the strings for you. I've
inserted records with any number of characters using this method without any
problems reading in or out of the database.
I'm not sure if a direct
Very interesting stuff indeed, IMHO. Some time ago I implemented what amounts
to a simplified spreadsheet as part of an iOS app. There were cells containing
numbers, arithmetic operations on the cells, and displays of the results. It
very quickly emerged that every cell had to be stored in two f
Hi Brahmanathaswami,
My code was begun back in LC 5.5 slowly making the transition through 6 and
then 7.
I think I still have a switch in there in case the stack is opened in LC 6 to
ensure it does some of the fudging required.
I have learnt in doing all this that standards (such as ePub 2) seem
Hi Bruce,
Good news: if you have a look at the bug report, the last comment is a
link to the GitHub pull request in which the bug is addressed.
The milestone of the pull request is 7.1.0 RC 1, so in the next version
of LiveCode 7.1 that will be released, the bug will be fixed :)
Regards,
S
Yep, Unicode is the future :-) It is also a considerable part of the
digital past already, just not so much LiveCode's.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 5027
32 matches
Mail list logo
