Re: An idea for the project browser

2015-12-02 Thread Sri
More: Option-click on an object would open another PB with the clicked object selected. Drag would move and Option-drag would copy an object (between the PBs). Regards, Sri -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/An-idea-for-the-project-browser-tp4699

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Geoff Canyon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:10 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > In this situation it is impossible to know where you are unless you can > always see the stack name. So I was trying to get the same view in > Navigator that I get in AB where the stack I'm in is always clearly > visible. In Navigator, once

An idea for the project browser

2015-12-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
I'm sticking with the App Browser until it kicks the bucket (and I hope that's never.) But here's one idea that might help me use the PB more often: Put a breadcrumb trail at the top, just above the scrolling list. It would always give the path to the selected object: stack "myStack"/card "

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 12/2/2015 4:38 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: Interesting discussion and just emphasizes how different folks have different needs for the IDE. I was wondering when you'd jump in. :) To be fair, I have only looked at your screen shots on the web site (they're very small on my screen, btw, so not

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
On 12/2/2015 3:45 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote: >I spent a little time yesterday seeing if I could simulate a list of >stacks by lining up several navigators but it isn't very workable. ​I must still not be understanding this use case. Navigator has a list of stacks in the stack menu. The trade-off o

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Peter Haworth
Absolutely, and they all have their own benefits. Pete lcSQL Software Home of lcStackBrowser and SQLiteAdmin On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Geoff Canyon wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:3

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Geoff Canyon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Peter Haworth wrote: > Hi Jacque, > Interesting discussion and just emphasizes how different folks have > different needs for the IDE. > > ​We certainly do have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to project tools ;-)​ _

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Peter Haworth
Hi Jacque, Interesting discussion and just emphasizes how different folks have different needs for the IDE. I haven't jumped in before but I believe it will do everything you with with the big exception of the "horizontal" layout issue. Here's a few things that I think might help with that. Geoff

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Geoff Canyon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > re-expanding a navigator covers up the others ​Only if you set them up to cover other Navigators -- it expands back to where it was. On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > I spent a little time yesterday seeing if I c

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Geoff Canyon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > remove the showLines ​This should work as well.​ ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferen

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread Geoff Canyon
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:41 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > (Navigator is a problem for me in that respect, btw.) ​Interesting. It's just a field, so this should work: set the textSize of fld ​"list" of stack "revNavigator" to 14 -- or whatever you like save stack "revNavigator" 14 works nicely f

Re: Death of the Application Browser

2015-12-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
Well, in the interests of learning then: On 12/2/2015 12:01 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote: I see a list of stacks/cards on the left. So there could be substantial scrolling to get to the stack/card you're looking for, right? Yes, sometimes. But not as much as in the Project Browser because stacks an

Re: [OT] Free Game for iOS and Android

2015-12-02 Thread J. Landman Gay
I fell into MV and couldn't come out for days. It's the first really original game idea I've seen in years, and beautifully done. On December 2, 2015 10:02:00 AM CST, Scott Rossi wrote: >The mobile puzzle game Monument Valley by ustwo is currently available >for >free on both iOS and Android vi

Re: hunting a bug on scripted custom properties not being saved

2015-12-02 Thread [-hh]
> Richard E.H. wrote: > I have a routine to bump the versions of stacks and save ... Read your first post again. I misunderstood what you are doing. By "the versions of stacks" you mean your development version of stacks, not using 'the stackFileVersion' of LC. Sorry. Hope you get this solved.

Re: hunting a bug on scripted custom properties not being saved

2015-12-02 Thread [-hh]
Yes, I got it now. Didn't read exact enough, sorry. Perhaps your's is somehow connected to the new option "Preserve stack file version on stacks saved in legacy format" of the 'Files & Memory' tab of the prefrences? Would be interesting how your technique and this option interfere? To know at whi

Re: [OT] Free Game for iOS and Android

2015-12-02 Thread Colin Holgate
Made with Unity, if anyone was wondering. > On Dec 2, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Scott Rossi wrote: > > The mobile puzzle game Monument Valley by ustwo is currently available for > free on both iOS and Android via Amazon Undergound. Described as more more > of an experience than a game, this title is a

[OT] Free Game for iOS and Android

2015-12-02 Thread Scott Rossi
The mobile puzzle game Monument Valley by ustwo is currently available for free on both iOS and Android via Amazon Undergound. Described as more more of an experience than a game, this title is a beautiful example of visual design, mechanics, and sound design. Even at full price I encourage people

Re: hunting a bug on scripted custom properties not being saved

2015-12-02 Thread Dr. Hawkins
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, [-hh] wrote: > Up to LC 8-dp9, the properties are there, but NOT displayed in the new PI. > That's not the same bug, then. Here it would retrieve the old value, and open the older file. -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-8462 ___

Re: Issue with creating a Recent Files menu...

2015-12-02 Thread Paul Dupuis
A colleague kindly pointed out that in the User Guide, it states: "To put an & or / character in the text of a menu, double the characters: && or //. Putting the ( character anywhere in a line disables the menu item. To put a ( character in a menu item without disabling it, precede it with a back

Re: WMVCore.dll?

2015-12-02 Thread Malte Brill
Hi Mark, > We will probably have to try and weak-link that particular dependency. > Could you file a bug report, and we'll look into it. > Done. #16531 Cheers, Malte ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this ur

Re: hunting a bug on scripted custom properties not being saved

2015-12-02 Thread [-hh]
I had similar behaviour, connected to that, with the new property inspector. I set and saved properties in LC 7, reopened the stack in LC. The LC 7 PI shows the properties, also after reopening. Up to LC 8-dp9, the properties are there, but NOT displayed in the new PI. This bug is removed in LC

Re: WMVCore.dll?

2015-12-02 Thread Mark Waddingham
On 2015-12-02 12:30, Malte Brill wrote: 1) why the dependency? 2) when was this introduced? (7.0.6 did not expose this, but 7.1 did) This will likely be due to the 'camera' feature that was added to 7.1. 3) can this be either documented or be an option in the standalone builder, so it is not

WMVCore.dll?

2015-12-02 Thread Malte Brill
Hi all, I got a strange report from a customer that a LiveCode application can not start due to a missing WMVCore.dll Quick google search brought up that other applications may have the same issue if a Media Pack is not installed. However my app does not even use a player, so 1) why the depend