Robert Mann wrote:
> So DO make a backup of your on-rev accounts locally after each major
> modification!!
With portable HDDs selling at around US$50/GB multiple redundant backups
are easy, esp. with:
> Has anybody made a stack that would scan changes within site files
> and make local copy o
CLOSURE ON THAT SUBJECT :: had to reinstall corrupted files / folders
1. Because I did not have a save copy locally (now I have!)
2. Because they only seem to have one daily backup and told me the corrupted
files had just been corrupted before backup... ?? how can they not have a
d-1 backup?? I wo
On 01/07/2016 06:43 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
The url *does* throw a 404, though.
...and now they fixed the link.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, uns
On 01/07/2016 06:05 PM, Lyn Teyla wrote:
The stacks are a free download, and from what I can tell, don’t require you to
be a HostM.com client. You just need to be able to run LiveCode Server.
Maybe.
The url *does* throw a 404, though.
--
Mark Wieder
ahsoftw...@gmail.com
__
OK, thanks Lyn. I will have to check with my web host (Dreamhost) how to
set LC server up.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 PM Lyn Teyla wrote:
> Peter Haworth wrote:
>
> > Thanks for that info, that will certainly help me when I start looking
> into
> > LC server. Unfortunately, I think I'm about
> On 8 Jan 2016, at 12:42 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> Monte Goulding wrote:
>
> >> My understanding is that spawn-fcgi uses fork, no?
> >
> > Yes. Are you looking to implement your own process manager though?
>
> What constitutes "process manager" in this context?
Something that spawns proc
Peter Haworth wrote:
> Thanks for that info, that will certainly help me when I start looking into
> LC server. Unfortunately, I think I'm about 6 months into a 2-year
> contract with my current web host so probably could not switch at this
> point.
The stacks are a free download, and from what
Thank you, Colin.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 1:05 PM, Colin Holgate wrote:
>
> Exact fit is rarely what you would want to do, it will distort the card area
> to fit the screen size.
>
> The black bars are because you didn’t include the default-5...@2x.png file.
>
>
>> On Jan
Todd Fabacher wrote:
>> Le 7 janv. 2016 ? 20:03, Richard Gaskin a ?crit :
>>
>> LiveCode is a great language, and if we had the ability to fork we
>> should be able to build a wide range of powerful, scalable,
>> efficient systems, breaking far beyond the limitations of CGI we're
>> limited to no
Monte Goulding wrote:
>> My understanding is that spawn-fcgi uses fork, no?
>
> Yes. Are you looking to implement your own process manager though?
What constitutes "process manager" in this context?
>> Once we have forking we could completely replace Apache (or NGineX
>> or Node.js) with a ful
I think this will work
SELECT sum(due) from mytable WHERE ORDER BY cname || caddr GROUP
BY cname || caddr
GROUP may have to come before ORDER, don't remember.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:32 PM Dr. Hawkins wrote:
> I need to sum amounts and return keys where other fields are the same on an
> in
Yes, Monte is correct, we switch our servers to Node.JS simply because of
the ease of use, speed and productivity gains.
BUT...there is tremendous power is using one language as a solution. The
barrier of entry for most LiveCoders is very high to get a proper cloud
App. If like LC had a solution l
+1 for Me also
I would for sure would support funding for this. LiveCode in a Node.JS like
solution would be a KILLER!!! Especially if there was a direct connection
to MongoDB which we are HEAVY users of.
--Todd
> Le 7 janv. 2016 ? 20:03, Richard Gaskin a
?crit :
>
> I'm just far enough into R
Hi Lyn,
Thanks for that info, that will certainly help me when I start looking into
LC server. Unfortunately, I think I'm about 6 months into a 2-year
contract with my current web host so probably could not switch at this
point.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:17 PM Lyn Teyla wrote:
> Peter Haworth w
Hi Alex,
You're probably right on the lc server issue (and thanks for the
compliment).
I already had a library of php db access scripts on my server which I've
been using in batch cron jobson a nightly basis so the guts of what I
needed to do was already in place, whereas I have never installed LC
> My understanding is that spawn-fcgi uses fork, no?
Yes. Are you looking to implement your own process manager though?
>
>
> > We mainly need two things for FastCGI:
> > - an engine with the FastCGI accept loop as the main loop (LC Server
> > just starts up and quits at the end of the code and
I need to sum amounts and return keys where other fields are the same on an
in-memory database.
I have my own unique key uniqDna, fields cname and cadr, and numeric field
due
I want to SUM(due) for each unique cname||cadr, and get get the
corresponding keys.
DISTINCT ON would due this, but it's
Peter Haworth wrote:
> Is this common practice when accessing mySQL on a host server? If so, is
> there a better way to set about accessing a mySQL database in these
> circumstances, perhaps using php scripts on the server instead of accessing
> the db directly with the LC database functions?
On
Monte Goulding wrote:
>> On 8 Jan 2016, at 6:03 am, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> I think we need a new command that launches a specified process
>> but in a way that uses a call to "fork" to pass file descriptors
>> (which include sockets and other I/O info) to the child process.
>>
>> In many way
That would be a great addition, although I confess I am highly dependent on the
"finish what you are doing and move on to the next step" model, or single
threading as the less tech savy might call it. ;-)
Bob S
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:03 , Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> I'm just far enough into R
Why would you consider php scripts, when it would (I assume) be much
more familiar for you to use .lc scripts on LCServer, or CGI, scripts ?
In fact, given it's you :-), I would think you could write such LC
access scripts in your sleep :-), probably better than most of us.
-- Alex.
On 07/01
Hmm… I’m not convinced we need this for FastCGI. Apache mod_fcgid will start up
processes for you and for Nginx and other servers that don’t do that you could
use spawn-fcgi. I have done some thinking on FastCGI after Todd asked me to
look into the feasibility of it and was considering funding o
I wonder if Andres Dblib could be modified so that it could be used on both
ends. On the client side, use the where, columns etc functionality to
build up an array, (dbA) encode it, and post it to a page where its
decoded, copied to the dbA variable (after you "start using.." andres
stack) and the
> Le 7 janv. 2016 à 20:03, Richard Gaskin a écrit :
>
> I'm just far enough into Robert Love's "Linux System Programming" that I
> think the solution to FastCGI may be much simpler than I'd previously thought.
>
<—snip —>
> Forking seems so common in other tools, and not having it appears to
I'm just far enough into Robert Love's "Linux System Programming" that I
think the solution to FastCGI may be much simpler than I'd previously
thought.
I think we need a new command that launches a specified process but in a
way that uses a call to "fork" to pass file descriptors (which includ
Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Here's another piece of good news:
>
> Mark Waddingham and I spent a couple of hours yesterday morning
> adding support for literal arrays to the LiveCode Builder Language.
> In LiveCode 8.0.0 DP 13, you will be able to write:
>
> variable tArray as Array
> put {"
> Am 07.01.2016 um 18:34 schrieb Peter Haworth :
>
> It seems that to access a mySQL database on my web host's servers from a
> Livecode program, I have to configure "Allowable hosts" in the database
> configuration. That can be an ip address or a domain name such as "@.
> mydomain.com”
>
if
Peter,
I do this on my server. I keep the php on my server. Then I only have to allow
access from "localhost' because the php is being run on the server. The php is
accessed with "post" command from livecode. If you need an example, I can send
you a sample stack, with some sample php.
Bill
Will
It seems that to access a mySQL database on my web host's servers from a
Livecode program, I have to configure "Allowable hosts" in the database
configuration. That can be an ip address or a domain name such as "@.
mydomain.com"
The program in question will be used by perhaps a half dozen users,
> Le 7 janv. 2016 à 14:18, Peter TB Brett a écrit :
>
> On 07/01/2016 11:59, Pierre Sahores wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Le 7 janv. 2016 à 03:56, Lyn Teyla a écrit :
>>>
>>> Monte Goulding wrote:
>>>
Personally I’d rather you declare force majeure on wait for HTML5 and
apply your considerab
> Le 7 janv. 2016 à 03:56, Lyn Teyla a écrit :
>
> Monte Goulding wrote:
>
>> Personally I’d rather you declare force majeure on wait for HTML5 and apply
>> your considerable talents to implementing non-blocking versions of
>> everything.
>
> Agreed. Won’t the planned improvements to networ
31 matches
Mail list logo