Re: Refer to new group?

Funnily enough I bumped up against this on Monday when making this patch https://github.com/livecode/livecode-ide/pull/1301/files and filed this report http://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18118

Re: Report Errors from the IDE?

Hi. Might this be related to the fact that I see spurious breakpoints listed in the breakpoint tab of the script editor for lines far greater than the scripts to which they ostensibly belong? In other words, a script of 700 lines might have three breakpoints in the 2000's. I am constantly

Report Errors from the IDE?

We are using a console log and trapping errors… sometimes things pop up from the IDE like 8/2/16 12:13 PM [error] API#20 >>> errorDialog : Handler: error in statement: textReplaceRaw on line 2108 this is not in any script of ours will it help to report these? very difficult to replicate… or

Re: Refer to new group?

At 10:41 AM -0700 8/2/2016, Phil Davis wrote: Not so. Try this: You're right. I was thinking in terms of grouping objects that are already at the top of the layers, as with a bunch of newly created objects. ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: Destroy Browser Window

If setting its visible to false, and/or moving it off screen won't work, treat it like the control it is. If you were deleting a field, you would "delete field "fieldname.." or whatever method you wish to use to specify the specific field. Do the same with the browser widget. delete widget

Re: Create and Delete Browser Widget?

Can you simply set the rect of the browser widget to be off screen? On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami < bra...@hindu.org> wrote: > Thks for the tips. > > Results: > > Stack A > has a mobileScroller on card 1 > the group that scrolls has links, some to out to

Re: Refer to new group?

I thought I had read that the LC guys had fixed "it" to reliably refer the newly created group. If this still doesn't work, another workaround is to set the name of the templateGroup before creating any group, so you have a guaranteed reference when the group is created. I've used this option

Re: Refer to new group?

Wilhelm Sanke wrote: > submitted in 2009 is still pending. > *Bug 8275* -Groups: > Bugs and features ("last group" broken)? > *Status*: PENDING Thanks, Wilhelm. I had thought I'd seen a new engine enhancement for this, but apparently I'm

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

> Am 02.08.2016 um 21:09 schrieb J. Landman Gay >: > > > That's terrific, Mattias. When you have it finished, could you send me a link > so that I can put it on my site for other Zygodact customers to use too? > Yes of course.

Re: [ ANN ] Release 8.1.0 DP-3

Note recent update on the other thread BR: I hit the "no business license" wall on attempt to use "tsNetUploadFileSync" CHARLES: Ah, yes. Sorry, I have forgotten that detail and it was not mentioned in the DP3 release announcement. For Indy users, SFTP and SMTP(S) protocols do not support

Re: Refer to new group?

Bug 8275 about "Groups: Bugs and features ("last group" broken)?" submitted in 2009 is still pending. Kind regards, Wilhelm Sanke *Bug 8275* -Groups: Bugs and features ("last group" broken)? *Status*: PENDING *Version*: 4.0.0

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

On 8/2/2016 7:30 AM, Matthias Rebbe wrote: Am 02.08.2016 um 12:32 schrieb Graham Samuel >: Matthias, are you planning to use Zygodact with the Fastspring platform? Is this possible? I’ve literally just started exploring this area, so I’d appreciate

Re: OT: Need better hardware vs need better software./ Sub-subject "HyperPad"

7On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:23:54 +0300 Richmond wrote: Somewhere deep inside one of my backup disks I have a feeling there is a version of RunRev/LC for DOS . . . . There's certainly a version of Metacard. It might be "fun" to take it/them for a trot with FreeDOS.

Re: Refer to new group?

Phil. Grouping the first two buttons maximizes their layer numbers. I see no reference to this in the "group" entry in the dictionary, though perhaps this makes sense, in that those first two controls, by virtue of being grouped, are relegated frontwards in layer number. They are "newer"

Re: Refer to new group?

I should have said "refer to the child control by ID or name" - neither of which are affected by grouping. Phil On 8/2/16 9:37 AM, Phil Davis wrote: If you use the "owner" method of getting the group's ID, be sure you refer to the child control by ID - its number will *always* be changed

Re: Refer to new group?

Not so. Try this: create button "first" create button "second" create button "third" put the name of button 1 group button 1 and button 2 put CR & the name of button 1 after msg Under your scenario, I would expect the name of button 1 to be "first" both times we put the

Re: Refer to new group?

At 9:37 AM -0700 8/2/2016, Phil Davis wrote: If you use the "owner" method of getting the group's ID, be sure you refer to the child control by ID - its number will *always* be changed by the act of grouping it. ... if you refer to it as "control N", but not if you refer to it as "field N"

Re: Refer to new group?

If you use the "owner" method of getting the group's ID, be sure you refer to the child control by ID - its number will *always* be changed by the act of grouping it. Phil Davis On 8/2/16 9:04 AM, Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote: At 8:37 AM -0700 8/2/2016, Richard Gaskin wrote: Apparently the

Re: [ ANN ] Release 8.1.0 DP-3

Hi Charles, Not a big deal but I'm wondering why the library stack for tsNet does not have a name that begins with "rev". There are a few other exceptions to that convention but I don't recall any recent IDE stack additions that weren't named that way. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:51 AM Charles

Re: Refer to new group?

At 8:37 AM -0700 8/2/2016, Richard Gaskin wrote: Apparently the "group" command is an exception to the general rule that "it" will contain the long ID of a newly-created object after a command that creates it. And using "last" is not always reliable with groups. Since your script knows

Re: Refer to new group?

Just did this: on mouseUp group btn "A" and btn "B" set the name of the last group to "GROOOP" end mouseUp and it worked. Why would 'last' not be reliable? Richmond. On 2.08.2016 18:37, Richard Gaskin wrote: I vaguely recall some new language element recently added to allow us to

Refer to new group?

I vaguely recall some new language element recently added to allow us to more reliably refer to newly-created groups. Apparently the "group" command is an exception to the general rule that "it" will contain the long ID of a newly-created object after a command that creates it. And using

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Folks, I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier to just set up a payment web page that you interact with in the browser widget. Then you could, for instance, for PayPal, just use their easy payment button to get paid. There would need to be https communication, probably with some kind of

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Wow! That’s great. Thanks Graham > On 2 Aug 2016, at 13:30, Matthias Rebbe > wrote: > > > >> Am 02.08.2016 um 12:32 schrieb Graham Samuel > >: >> >> Matthias, are you planning to use Zygodact with the Fastspring

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

> Am 02.08.2016 um 12:32 schrieb Graham Samuel >: > > Matthias, are you planning to use Zygodact with the Fastspring platform? Is > this possible? I’ve literally just started exploring this area, so I’d > appreciate any pointers. > Yes and yes. I

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Mark, thanks for chiming in. > Am 02.08.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Mark Schonewille > : > > Always the same misunderstandings about taxes. The new VAT rules don't apply > to most people on this list, because they don't sell enough. Sorry, i have to disagree. If

Re: The Joy of Removing Features.

The ghost of Douglas Adams is not that far away. Ouch; wait a minute; Douglas Adams was an atheist: that makes things even more confusing: Douglas Adams stated there wasn't a God and there wasn't a metaphysical world; but the ghost of Douglas Adams is hovering over this e-mail message:

Re: libURL and New TsNet Commands/Failures

On 2/08/2016 5:48 am, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: OK since a) "libURLftpUploadFile" has no hook to/support from, tsNet for schema "sftp://; AND b) I hit the "no business license" wall on attempt to use "tsNetUploadFileSync" Ah, yes. Sorry, I have forgotten that detail and it was

Re: [ ANN ] Release 8.1.0 DP-3

On 2/08/2016 5:25 am, J. Landman Gay wrote: On 8/1/2016 12:41 AM, Charles Warwick wrote: You can issue post/get/put asynchronous commands even to the same server with the Indy license using tsNet commands directly Remind me, is "get url" blocking? Yes :-)

Re: [ ANN ] Release 8.1.0 DP-3

On 2/08/2016 4:10 am, Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: @Charles: So, in effect, just to clarify my understanding… the *only* difference between the TSnet indy and business license is that the indy user has the added burden of coding explicit tsNet commands to get the same asynchronous

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Always the same misunderstandings about taxes. The new VAT rules don't apply to most people on this list, because they don't sell enough. If your tax consultant say "play safe" then make sure to change tax consultant as soon as possible. Clearly, s/he is unaware of the rules. Kind regards,

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Matthias, are you planning to use Zygodact with the Fastspring platform? Is this possible? I’ve literally just started exploring this area, so I’d appreciate any pointers. Graham > On 2 Aug 2016, at 09:59, Matthias Rebbe > wrote: > > Thanks Hugh, > > i

Re: The Joy of Removing Features.

Good idea. I *almost* called it "Part 1 of a 4-part trilogy", just because all trilogies need at least one sequel, or prequel, but maybe it would be better to leave out the boring bits and make it simply 3 parts :-) On 02/08/2016 00:44, Kay C Lan wrote: Enjoyed Part 1, looking forward to

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

Thanks Hugh, i had the same impression, but my tax consultant recommend to go the save and easy way and use a seller platform. So i set up an account with Fastspring this morning. At the moment i am building a web service around the my license generator. Seems not to be very complicated.

Re: looking for an alternative to KAGI, because KAGI ceased operations

EU VAT is only due on AUTOMATED transactions. Communicating by email and attachments does NOT constitute "Digital Services"... https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/41 5931/VAT_MOSS_Flow_chart_FSB_edit_V1_0.pdf If your product requires a key (i.e. they are

Re: OT: Need better hardware vs need better software.

Somewhere deep inside one of my backup disks I have a feeling there is a version of RunRev/LC for DOS . . . . There's certainly a version of Metacard. It might be "fun" to take it/them for a trot with FreeDOS. R. On 2.08.2016 09:53, mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote: Quoting Richmond

Re: OT: Need better hardware vs need better software.

Quoting Richmond : Inevitably: It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it. Richmond. Thanks. I knew I could count on you. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list

Re: OT: Need better hardware vs need better software.

Inevitably: It's not the size that matters, it's how you use it. Richmond. On 2.08.2016 04:59, Jim sims wrote: But if they just work smarter with what they have the POLITICIAN cannot boast: "I'm getting the latest and greatest stuff for you, planning ahead for you, and new business will want